All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] aiopool: protect with a mutex
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:19:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJvyCmFMlsbyni0L@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510085941.22769-7-eesposit@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:59:41AM +0200, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> Divide the fields in AioTaskPool in IN and Status, and
> introduce a CoQueue instead of .wait to take care of suspending
> and resuming the calling coroutine, and a lock to protect the
> busy_tasks counter accesses and the AioTask .ret field.

The thread-safety concerns with the aio_task.h API are unclear to me.
The API is designed to have a "main" coroutine that adds task
functions to the pool and waits for them to complete. Task functions
execute in coroutines (up to the pool's max_busy_tasks limit).

It seems like the API was designed to be called only from its main
coroutine so why make everything thread-safe? Is there a caller that
shares an AioTaskPool between threads? Or will the task functions switch
threads somehow?

What exactly is the new thread-safety model? Please document it.
Unfortunately aio_task.h doesn't have doc comments already but it will
be necessary if there are thread-safety concerns.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10  8:59 [PATCH 0/6] block-copy: make helper APIs thread safe Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] ratelimit: treat zero speed as unlimited Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:00   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] block-copy: let ratelimit handle a speed of 0 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:06   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] blockjob: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:17   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] progressmeter: protect with a mutex Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:28   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-10 16:52     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 17:17       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-10 17:57         ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-11 12:28     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-12  7:09       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-12 15:53   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] co-shared-resource: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:40   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-11  8:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-12 15:44   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-12 18:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-14 14:10     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-14 14:26       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-05-14 14:32         ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-14 15:30           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-05-14 17:28             ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-14 21:15               ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-05-14 21:53                 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-15  7:11                   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-05-14 17:55       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10  8:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] aiopool: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-05-10 11:56   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-11  8:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-12 15:19   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2021-05-10 10:55 ` [PATCH 0/6] block-copy: make helper APIs thread safe Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-12 14:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJvyCmFMlsbyni0L@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.