From: "Đoàn Trần Công Danh" <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
"Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] t6400: preserve git ls-files exit status code
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:01:37 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNxPEb4V3SIqGRl9@danh.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6n8uipn.fsf@gitster.g>
On 2021-06-29 20:36:36-0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>
> > I may be misunderstanding your suggestion, but isn't the proposed
> > test_output_wc_l() function the same as what Danh had originally
> > implemented several re-rolls back (though he named it
> > test_line_count_cmd())?
>
> Could be, except that I recall we saw extra noises like --out/--err
> that weren't used and contaminating the current working directory,
> which are gone from the latest iteration.
Yes, in v{1,2}, there's the extra noises of --out and --err,
but it's gone in v3.
I guess you're thinking about the contamination of $PWD iff it's not
a git worktree. That could be simplified by BUG-ging if $PWD is not
a git worktree.
Maybe, you're thinking about the extra noises to handle the failure run
of command under check? That could be dropped, too.
Would you mind looking at v3 1/4 again to see what is your opinion
there? I don't mind re-roll a same or simplified version of v3,
with s/test_line_count_cmd/test_output_wc_l/ if you see fit.
> The simplification
> compared to that iteration is quite welcome---it made the resulting
> code that uses the helper easier to follow compared to the earlier
> attempts. But this round simplifies it too much and the results got
> harder to follow by burying the command name in the helper and made
> it less obvious that the last part of the helper's parameters are
> arguments given to ls-files, I would think.
--
Danh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 17:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] t: new helper test_line_count_cmd Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-15 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] test-lib-functions: introduce test_line_count_cmd Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-17 4:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-15 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] t6402: use find(1) builtin to filter instead of grep Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-15 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] t0041: use test_line_count_cmd to check std{out,err} Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-16 3:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-16 14:21 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-17 0:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-15 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] t6400: use test_line_count_cmd to count # of lines in stdout Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-15 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] t6402: " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-19 1:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] t: new helper test_line_count_cmd Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-19 5:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-06-19 6:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-19 6:26 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-06-19 6:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-21 23:52 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-22 0:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-06-19 1:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] test-lib-functions: introduce test_line_count_cmd Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-21 9:08 ` Andrei Rybak
2021-06-24 19:23 ` Andrei Rybak
2021-06-19 1:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] t6402: use find(1) builtin to filter instead of grep Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-21 8:17 ` Andrei Rybak
2021-06-21 23:54 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-19 1:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] t6400: use test_line_count_cmd to count # of lines in stdout Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-19 1:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] t6402: " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] t640{0,2}: preserve ls-files exit status code Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] t6400: preserve git " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-29 14:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-06-29 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-30 1:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-06-30 3:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-30 11:01 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh [this message]
2021-06-30 20:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] t6402: preserve git " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-06-29 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] t640{0,2}: preserve ls-files " Junio C Hamano
2021-07-04 5:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] new test-libs-function: test_stdout_line_count Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-07-04 5:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] test-lib-functions: introduce test_stdout_line_count Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-07-04 5:56 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-06 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-07 3:03 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-07-04 5:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] t6400: preserve git ls-files exit status code Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-07-04 5:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] t6402: preserve git " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNxPEb4V3SIqGRl9@danh.dev \
--to=congdanhqx@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.