From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BC0C433EF for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 12:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234404AbiGYMxW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:53:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235276AbiGYMxR (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:53:17 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE2711444; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 05:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea972976f8329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9729:76f8:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8B53C1EC050F; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:53:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1658753587; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=bVyez+KaivaZkgkelxLjIWo6gk1pzXjts4b4tXUfE5E=; b=AHidmyfFxdXR2dBq+boERfOhawIGJo2oSkzqgMeK9Pho+BveJMbsqrEXQQj0wi0jbHcucQ zukVMxUDwR1MUr5mEzksdDD18I73EbF5WDAd170PQSRrR5icGjeSnnSHQZURb/aN4nftPo 7/K8iVTmbBqXUEwDGoZe9Bf16jdaIyM= Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:53:03 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Dave Hansen , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andy Lutomirski , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Morton , Joerg Roedel , Ard Biesheuvel , Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , Mike Rapoport , marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com, khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory Message-ID: References: <20220614120231.48165-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220614120231.48165-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <707ca113-c2a2-8fe2-a22c-5be13adc7bb4@intel.com> <7d664831-a78c-4a4f-5bd6-f0e04463ca7c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d664831-a78c-4a4f-5bd6-f0e04463ca7c@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:38:57PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > The less core-MM code to handle unaccepted memory the better. Meaning, > that any kind of additional pre-acceptance (in addition to what we have > here) needs good justification. I actually mean to have a user interface to have the core code pre-accept. I.e., interface to what will be already there anyway. Or is that frowned upon too? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette