All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] vpci: Add resizable bar support
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:21:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6sWnK1BYxArBq--@macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211022257.1690366-1-Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:22:57AM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Some devices, like AMDGPU, support resizable bar capability,
> but vpci of Xen doesn't support this feature, so they fail
> to resize bars and then cause probing failure.
> 
> According to PCIe spec, each bar that supports resizing has
> two registers, PCI_REBAR_CAP and PCI_REBAR_CTRL. So, add
> handlers to support resizing the size of BARs.
> 
> Note that Xen will only trap PCI_REBAR_CTRL, as PCI_REBAR_CAP
> is read-only register and the hardware domain already gets
> access to it without needing any setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

> ---
> Hi all,
> v7->v8 changes:
> * Modified commit message and some comments.
> * Deleted unused function vpci_hw_write32.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jiqian Chen.
> 
> v6->v7 changes:
> * Deleted codes that add register for PCI_REBAR_CAP, and added comments to explain why.
> * Added comments to explain why use "continue" when fail to add register for PCI_REBAR_CTRL.
> 
> v5->v6 changes:
> * Changed "1UL" to "1ULL" in PCI_REBAR_CTRL_SIZE idefinition for 32 bit architecture.
> * In rebar_ctrl_write used "bar - pdev->vpci->header.bars" to get index instead of reading
>   from register.
> * Added the index of BAR to error messages.
> * Changed to "continue" instead of "return an error" when vpci_add_register failed.
> 
> v4->v5 changes:
> * Called pci_size_mem_bar in rebar_ctrl_write to get addr and size of BAR instead of setting
>   their values directly after writing new size to hardware.
> * Changed from "return" to "continue" when index/type of BAR are not correct during initializing
>   BAR.
> * Corrected the value of PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_SIZE from "0x00001F00" to "0x00003F00".
> * Renamed PCI_REBAR_SIZE_BIAS to PCI_REBAR_CTRL_SIZE_BIAS.
> * Re-defined "PCI_REBAR_CAP_SHIFT 4" to "PCI_REBAR_CAP_SIZES_MASK 0xFFFFFFF0U".
> 
> v3->v4 changes:
> * Removed PCI_REBAR_CAP_SIZES since it was not needed, and added
>   PCI_REBAR_CAP_SHIFT and PCI_REBAR_CTRL_SIZES.
> * Added parameter resizable_sizes to struct vpci_bar to cache the support resizable sizes and
>   added the logic in init_rebar().
> * Changed PCI_REBAR_CAP to PCI_REBAR_CAP(n) (4+8*(n)), changed PCI_REBAR_CTRL to
>   PCI_REBAR_CTRL(n) (8+8*(n)).
> * Added domain info of pci_dev to printings of init_rebar().
> 
> v2->v3 changes:
> * Used "bar->enabled" to replace "pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_COMMAND) & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY",
>   and added comments why it needs this check.
> * Added "!is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain)" check in init_rebar() to return EOPNOTSUPP for domUs.
> * Moved BAR type and index check into init_rebar(), then only need to check once.
> * Added 'U' suffix for macro PCI_REBAR_CAP_SIZES.
> * Added macro PCI_REBAR_SIZE_BIAS to represent 20.
> TODO: need to hide ReBar capability from hardware domain when init_rebar() fails.
> 
> v1->v2 changes:
> * In rebar_ctrl_write, to check if memory decoding is enabled, and added
>   some checks for the type of Bar.
> * Added vpci_hw_write32 to handle PCI_REBAR_CAP's write, since there is
>   no write limitation of dom0.
> * And has many other minor modifications as well.
> ---
>  xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile  |   2 +-
>  xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c   | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/include/xen/pci_regs.h |  15 +++++
>  xen/include/xen/vpci.h     |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> 
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile b/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
> index 1a1413b93e76..a7c8a30a8956 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/Makefile
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -obj-y += vpci.o header.o
> +obj-y += vpci.o header.o rebar.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_PCI_MSI) += msi.o msix.o
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..794f1168adf8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/rebar.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2025 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Author: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <xen/sched.h>
> +#include <xen/vpci.h>
> +
> +static void cf_check rebar_ctrl_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +                                      unsigned int reg,
> +                                      uint32_t val,
> +                                      void *data)
> +{
> +    struct vpci_bar *bar = data;
> +    const unsigned int index = bar - pdev->vpci->header.bars;
> +    uint64_t size = PCI_REBAR_CTRL_SIZE(val);

Since you define index as const you could also do the same with size.
Can adjust at commit, but I also don't have a strong opinion about
it.

Thanks, Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11  2:22 [PATCH v8] vpci: Add resizable bar support Jiqian Chen
2025-02-11  9:21 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-02-14  3:32   ` Chen, Jiqian
2025-02-14  7:35     ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-14  8:18       ` Oleksii Kurochko
2025-02-14  8:22         ` Chen, Jiqian
2025-02-14  8:39           ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-14  9:01             ` Chen, Jiqian
2025-02-14  9:12               ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6sWnK1BYxArBq--@macbook.local \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=Jiqian.Chen@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.