From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIDTC-0007QA-TD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:11:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIDT8-0001kc-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:11:18 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:5035) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIDT8-0001kV-Np for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:11:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:09:58 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5582E14F0200007800086A37@mail.emea.novell.com> <55AFBEDC020000780009417A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <55AFD416020000780009426D@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <55B0ADA70200007800094589@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] xen/HVM: atomically access pointers in bufioreq handling List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-devel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jan Beulich On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 22.07.15 at 19:24, wrote: > > > I'll queue this change up for the next QEMU release cycle. > > > > Thanks - v2 (with the adjusted description) just sent. > > > > It would however be nice for our variant in 4.6 to also gain this, > > perhaps independent of upstream's schedule. > > Is the hypervisor side going to go in 4.6? Do we need a freeze > exception or do we consider this a bug fix? Never mind, I have seen it is already in.