* [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate() Naveen N. Rao
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
This is v2 of the patches posted at:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2bc413d679c563d3ee338c318066777318577ab2.1505336870.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Changes:
- No changes in patch 1, 4 and 5.
- Comment updated in patch 2, as suggested by Masami.
- Patch 3 has changes to explicitly call out detection of jprobe in
ftrace_caller() and that this is only for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
- Naveen
Naveen N. Rao (6):
powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate()
powerpc/kprobes: Do not suppress instruction emulation if a single run
failed
powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handler
powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt
kernels
powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftrace
powerpc/jprobes: Validate break handler invocation as being due to a
jprobe_return()
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 30 ++++++++++++++---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 45 ++++++++++++++------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S | 4 +--
4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate()
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-10-08 8:43 ` [v2, " Michael Ellerman
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/kprobes: Do not suppress instruction emulation if a single run failed Naveen N. Rao
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
1. This is only used in kprobes.c, so make it static.
2. Remove the un-necessary (ret == 0) comparison in the else clause.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 367494dc67d9..c2a6ab38a67f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(arch_prepare_kretprobe);
-int try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ret;
unsigned int insn = *p->ainsn.insn;
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ int try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
printk("Can't step on instruction %x\n", insn);
BUG();
- } else if (ret == 0)
+ } else
/* This instruction can't be boosted */
p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/kprobes: Do not suppress instruction emulation if a single run failed
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate() Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handler Naveen N. Rao
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
Currently, we disable instruction emulation if emulate_step() fails for
any reason. However, such failures could be transient and specific to a
particular run. Instead, only disable instruction emulation if we have
never been able to emulate this. If we had emulated this instruction
successfully at least once, then we single step only this probe hit and
continue to try emulating the instruction in subsequent probe hits.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index c2a6ab38a67f..4c1702423676 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -261,9 +261,20 @@ static int try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
printk("Can't step on instruction %x\n", insn);
BUG();
- } else
- /* This instruction can't be boosted */
- p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If we haven't previously emulated this instruction, then it
+ * can't be boosted. Note it down so we don't try to do so again.
+ *
+ * If, however, we had emulated this instruction in the past,
+ * then this is just an error with the current run (for
+ * instance, exceptions due to a load/store). We return 0 so
+ * that this is now single-stepped, but continue to try
+ * emulating it in subsequent probe hits.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(p->ainsn.boostable != 1))
+ p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handler
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate() Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/kprobes: Do not suppress instruction emulation if a single run failed Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt kernels Naveen N. Rao
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
In commit c05b8c4474c03 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for
jprobes"), we added a helper is_current_kprobe_addr() to help detect if
the modified regs->nip was due to a jprobe or livepatch. Masami felt
that the function name was not quite clear. To that end, this patch
renames is_current_kprobe_addr() to __is_active_jprobe() and adds a
comment to (hopefully) better clarify the purpose of this helper. The
helper has also now been moved to kprobes-ftrace.c so that it is only
available for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 11 +++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 6 ------
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 8814a7249ceb..9f3be5c8a4a3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ extern int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
extern int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
extern int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern int kprobe_post_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern int is_current_kprobe_addr(unsigned long addr);
#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
+extern int __is_active_jprobe(unsigned long addr);
extern int skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb);
#else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
index 6c089d9757c9..48f675a73cff 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
@@ -25,6 +25,17 @@
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+/*
+ * This is called from ftrace code after invoking registered handlers to
+ * disambiguate regs->nip changes done by jprobes and livepatch. We check if
+ * there is an active jprobe at the provided address (mcount location).
+ */
+int __is_active_jprobe(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ struct kprobe *p = kprobe_running();
+ return (p && (unsigned long)p->addr == addr) ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
static nokprobe_inline
int __skip_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long orig_nip)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 4c1702423676..48a81614f629 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -43,12 +43,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[] = {{NULL, NULL}};
-int is_current_kprobe_addr(unsigned long addr)
-{
- struct kprobe *p = kprobe_running();
- return (p && (unsigned long)p->addr == addr) ? 1 : 0;
-}
-
bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
{
return (addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
index c98e90b4ea7b..c1cfcce0551d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ ftrace_call:
/* NIP has not been altered, skip over further checks */
beq 1f
- /* Check if there is an active kprobe on us */
+ /* Check if there is an active jprobe on us */
subi r3, r14, 4
- bl is_current_kprobe_addr
+ bl __is_active_jprobe
nop
/*
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt kernels
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handler Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftrace Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc/jprobes: Validate break handler invocation as being due to a jprobe_return() Naveen N. Rao
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
Kamalesh pointed out that we are getting the below call traces with
livepatched functions when we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT:
[ 495.470721] BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: cat/8394
[ 495.471167] caller is is_current_kprobe_addr+0x30/0x90
[ 495.471171] CPU: 4 PID: 8394 Comm: cat Tainted: G K 4.13.0-rc7-nnr+ #95
[ 495.471173] Call Trace:
[ 495.471178] [c00000008fd9b960] [c0000000009f039c] dump_stack+0xec/0x160 (unreliable)
[ 495.471184] [c00000008fd9b9a0] [c00000000059169c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170
[ 495.471187] [c00000008fd9ba30] [c000000000046460] is_current_kprobe_addr+0x30/0x90
[ 495.471191] [c00000008fd9ba60] [c00000000004e9a0] ftrace_call+0x1c/0xb8
[ 495.471195] [c00000008fd9bc30] [c000000000376fd8] seq_read+0x238/0x5c0
[ 495.471199] [c00000008fd9bcd0] [c0000000003cfd78] proc_reg_read+0x88/0xd0
[ 495.471203] [c00000008fd9bd00] [c00000000033e5d4] __vfs_read+0x44/0x1b0
[ 495.471206] [c00000008fd9bd90] [c0000000003402ec] vfs_read+0xbc/0x1b0
[ 495.471210] [c00000008fd9bde0] [c000000000342138] SyS_read+0x68/0x110
[ 495.471214] [c00000008fd9be30] [c00000000000bc6c] system_call+0x58/0x6c
Commit c05b8c4474c030 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for
jprobes") introduced a helper is_current_kprobe_addr() to help determine
if the current function has been livepatched or if it has a jprobe
installed, both of which modify the NIP. This was subsequently renamed
to __is_active_jprobe().
In the case of a jprobe, kprobe_ftrace_handler() disables pre-emption
before calling into setjmp_pre_handler() which returns without disabling
pre-emption. This is done to ensure that the jprobe handler won't
disappear beneath us if the jprobe is unregistered between the
setjmp_pre_handler() and the subsequent longjmp_break_handler() called
from the jprobe handler. Due to this, we can use __this_cpu_read() in
__is_active_jprobe() with the pre-emption check as we know that
pre-emption will be disabled.
However, if this function has been livepatched, we are still doing this
check and when we do so, pre-emption won't necessarily be disabled. This
results in the call trace shown above.
Fix this by only invoking __is_active_jprobe() when pre-emption is
disabled. And since we now guard this within a pre-emption check, we can
instead use raw_cpu_read() to get the current_kprobe value skipping the
check done by __this_cpu_read().
Fixes: c05b8c4474c030 ("powerpc/kprobes: Skip livepatch_handler() for jprobes")
Reported-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
index 48f675a73cff..1e54ec8ad85f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
@@ -32,8 +32,12 @@
*/
int __is_active_jprobe(unsigned long addr)
{
- struct kprobe *p = kprobe_running();
- return (p && (unsigned long)p->addr == addr) ? 1 : 0;
+ if (!preemptible()) {
+ struct kprobe *p = raw_cpu_read(current_kprobe);
+ return (p && (unsigned long)p->addr == addr) ? 1 : 0;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static nokprobe_inline
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftrace
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt kernels Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc/jprobes: Validate break handler invocation as being due to a jprobe_return() Naveen N. Rao
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
KPROBES_SANITY_TEST throws the below splat when CONFIG_PREEMPT is
enabled:
[ 3.140410] Kprobe smoke test: started
[ 3.149680] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count())
[ 3.149684] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3.149695] WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 1 at kernel/sched/core.c:3094 preempt_count_sub+0xcc/0x140
[ 3.149699] Modules linked in:
[ 3.149705] CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc7-nnr+ #97
[ 3.149709] task: c0000000fea80000 task.stack: c0000000feb00000
[ 3.149713] NIP: c00000000011d3dc LR: c00000000011d3d8 CTR: c000000000a090d0
[ 3.149718] REGS: c0000000feb03400 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (4.13.0-rc7-nnr+)
[ 3.149722] MSR: 8000000000021033 <SF,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000282 XER: 00000000
[ 3.149732] CFAR: c00000000015aa18 SOFTE: 0
<snip>
[ 3.149786] NIP [c00000000011d3dc] preempt_count_sub+0xcc/0x140
[ 3.149790] LR [c00000000011d3d8] preempt_count_sub+0xc8/0x140
[ 3.149794] Call Trace:
[ 3.149798] [c0000000feb03680] [c00000000011d3d8] preempt_count_sub+0xc8/0x140 (unreliable)
[ 3.149804] [c0000000feb036e0] [c000000000046198] kprobe_handler+0x228/0x4b0
[ 3.149810] [c0000000feb03750] [c0000000000269c8] program_check_exception+0x58/0x3b0
[ 3.149816] [c0000000feb037c0] [c00000000000903c] program_check_common+0x16c/0x170
[ 3.149822] --- interrupt: 0 at kprobe_target+0x8/0x20
LR = init_test_probes+0x248/0x7d0
[ 3.149829] [c0000000feb03ab0] [c000000000e4f048] kp+0x0/0x80 (unreliable)
[ 3.149835] [c0000000feb03b10] [c00000000004ea60] livepatch_handler+0x38/0x74
[ 3.149841] [c0000000feb03ba0] [c000000000d0de54] init_kprobes+0x1d8/0x208
[ 3.149846] [c0000000feb03c40] [c00000000000daa8] do_one_initcall+0x68/0x1d0
[ 3.149852] [c0000000feb03d00] [c000000000ce44f0] kernel_init_freeable+0x298/0x374
[ 3.149857] [c0000000feb03dc0] [c00000000000dd84] kernel_init+0x24/0x160
[ 3.149863] [c0000000feb03e30] [c00000000000bfec] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70
[ 3.149867] Instruction dump:
[ 3.149871] 419effdc 3d22001b 39299240 81290000 2f890000 409effc8 3c82ffcb 3c62ffcb
[ 3.149879] 3884bc68 3863bc18 4803d5fd 60000000 <0fe00000> 4bffffa8 60000000 60000000
[ 3.149890] ---[ end trace 432dd46b4ce3d29f ]---
[ 3.166003] Kprobe smoke test: passed successfully
The issue is that we aren't disabling preemption in
kprobe_ftrace_handler(). Disable it.
Fixes: ead514d5fb30a0 ("powerpc/kprobes: Add support for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE")
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
index 1e54ec8ad85f..4b1f34f685b1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long parent_nip,
/* Disable irq for emulating a breakpoint and avoiding preempt */
local_irq_save(flags);
hard_irq_disable();
+ preempt_disable();
p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)nip);
if (unlikely(!p) || kprobe_disabled(p))
@@ -101,12 +102,18 @@ void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long nip, unsigned long parent_nip,
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs))
__skip_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, orig_nip);
- /*
- * If pre_handler returns !0, it sets regs->nip and
- * resets current kprobe.
- */
+ else {
+ /*
+ * If pre_handler returns !0, it sets regs->nip and
+ * resets current kprobe. In this case, we still need
+ * to restore irq, but not preemption.
+ */
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return;
+ }
}
end:
+ preempt_enable_no_resched();
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc/jprobes: Validate break handler invocation as being due to a jprobe_return()
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftrace Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-09-22 9:10 ` Naveen N. Rao
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naveen N. Rao @ 2017-09-22 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal, Masami Hiramatsu, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli,
linuxppc-dev
Fix a circa 2005 FIXME by implementing a check to ensure that we
actually got into the jprobe break handler() due to the trap in
jprobe_return().
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 48a81614f629..a14c61855705 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -639,24 +639,22 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(setjmp_pre_handler);
void __used jprobe_return(void)
{
- asm volatile("trap" ::: "memory");
+ asm volatile("jprobe_return_trap:\n"
+ "trap\n"
+ ::: "memory");
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return);
-static void __used jprobe_return_end(void)
-{
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(jprobe_return_end);
-
int longjmp_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
- /*
- * FIXME - we should ideally be validating that we got here 'cos
- * of the "trap" in jprobe_return() above, before restoring the
- * saved regs...
- */
+ if (regs->nip != ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("jprobe_return_trap")) {
+ pr_debug("longjmp_break_handler NIP (0x%lx) does not match jprobe_return_trap (0x%lx)\n",
+ regs->nip, ppc_kallsyms_lookup_name("jprobe_return_trap"));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
memcpy(regs, &kcb->jprobe_saved_regs, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
/* It's OK to start function graph tracing again */
unpause_graph_tracing();
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2, 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate()
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate() Naveen N. Rao
@ 2017-10-08 8:43 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2017-10-08 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Naveen N. Rao; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Masami Hiramatsu, Kamalesh Babulal
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 09:10:43 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> 1. This is only used in kprobes.c, so make it static.
> 2. Remove the un-necessary (ret == 0) comparison in the else clause.
>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/22085337f5b9d7a7adf5c6cc4e007c
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-08 8:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-22 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/kprobes: More fixes Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/kprobes: Some cosmetic updates to try_to_emulate() Naveen N. Rao
2017-10-08 8:43 ` [v2, " Michael Ellerman
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/kprobes: Do not suppress instruction emulation if a single run failed Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/kprobes: Clean up jprobe detection in livepatch handler Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc/kprobes: Fix warnings from __this_cpu_read() on preempt kernels Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/jprobes: Disable preemption when triggered through ftrace Naveen N. Rao
2017-09-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc/jprobes: Validate break handler invocation as being due to a jprobe_return() Naveen N. Rao
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.