All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the mm tree
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 03:27:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f872c56b-ed45-4b45-8c40-52ddb3f2c809@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426154414.4d408fd7@canb.auug.org.au>

On 4/25/24 23:44, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kselftest tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    258ff696db6b ("selftests/mm: soft-dirty should fail if a testcase fails")
> 
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
> 
>    e6162a96c81d ("selftests/mm: ksft_exit functions do not return")
> 
> from the kselftest tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the former) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Thank you Stephen. I will keep track of this when I send pull request to Linus.

thanks,
-- Shuah

      reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-26  5:44 linux-next: manual merge of the kselftest tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-27  9:27 ` Shuah Khan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f872c56b-ed45-4b45-8c40-52ddb3f2c809@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.