From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (970903.SGI.8.8.7/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA811320 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:53:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA14052 for linux-list; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:50:52 -0800 Received: from hollywood.engr.sgi.com (hollywood.engr.sgi.com [150.166.61.38]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA14034 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:50:49 -0800 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by hollywood.engr.sgi.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA05008; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:50:39 -0800 Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA13843; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:50:23 -0800 Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net (snowcrash.cymru.net [163.164.160.3]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA29885; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:50:20 -0800 env-from (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (the-great-packet-bucket-in-the-sky [163.164.160.21] (may be forged)) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id XAA00035; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:50:13 GMT Received: by lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0xXb1y-0005FrC; Mon, 17 Nov 97 23:56 GMT Message-Id: From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Subject: Re: Pentium F00F bug Linux workaround; BSDI Response To: davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com (David S. Miller) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:56:37 +0000 (GMT) Cc: fisher@sgi.com, linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com, fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <199711172323.PAA27334@dm.cobaltmicro.com> from "David S. Miller" at Nov 17, 97 03:23:46 pm Content-Type: text Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk > BSDI putting out their patch ahead of that point in time was, if > anything, totally against how Intel wanted things happen. Dave talk this off list. And if you are going to say things like "XYZ violated their NDA" expect them to both hear about it and reply. Fair's fair. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Subject: Re: Pentium F00F bug Linux workaround; BSDI Response Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 23:56:37 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <199711172323.PAA27334@dm.cobaltmicro.com> from "David S. Miller" at Nov 17, 97 03:23:46 pm Content-Type: text Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com To: "David S. Miller" Cc: fisher@sgi.com, linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com, fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com Message-ID: <19971117235637.XkCdmvdgByzSvfsHSRVNWUcOtfOw4z2gtmyv5PehLs4@z> > BSDI putting out their patch ahead of that point in time was, if > anything, totally against how Intel wanted things happen. Dave talk this off list. And if you are going to say things like "XYZ violated their NDA" expect them to both hear about it and reply. Fair's fair.