From: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
To: <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: initialize rx_mcs_80 and rx_mcs_160 before use
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:35:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202023547.11141-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> (raw)
Currently in ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he() rx_mcs_80 and rx_mcs_160
are used to calculate max_nss, see
if (support_160)
max_nss = min(rx_mcs_80, rx_mcs_160);
else
max_nss = rx_mcs_80;
Kernel test robot complains on uninitialized symbols:
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c:2321 ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he() error: uninitialized symbol 'rx_mcs_80'.
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c:2321 ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he() error: uninitialized symbol 'rx_mcs_160'.
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c:2323 ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he() error: uninitialized symbol 'rx_mcs_80'.
This is because there are some code paths that never set them, so
the assignment of max_nss can come from uninitialized variables.
This could result in some unknown issues since a wrong peer_nss
might be passed to firmware.
Change to initialize them to an invalid value at the beginning. This
makes sense because even max_nss gets an invalid value, due to either
or both of them being invalid, we can get an valid peer_nss with
following guard:
arg->peer_nss = min(sta->deflink.rx_nss, max_nss)
Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.1 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.23
Fixes: 3db26ecf7114 ("ath11k: calculate the correct NSS of peer for HE capabilities")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401311243.NyXwWZxP-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
index bbf4d1f4d310..299f4f3d7659 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c
@@ -2294,6 +2294,8 @@ static void ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he(struct ath11k *ar,
mcs_160_map = le16_to_cpu(he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_160);
mcs_80_map = le16_to_cpu(he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_80);
+ /* Initialize rx_mcs_160 to 9 which is an invalid value */
+ rx_mcs_160 = 9;
if (support_160) {
for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
u8 mcs_160 = (mcs_160_map >> (2 * i)) & 3;
@@ -2305,6 +2307,8 @@ static void ath11k_peer_assoc_h_he(struct ath11k *ar,
}
}
+ /* Initialize rx_mcs_80 to 9 which is an invalid value */
+ rx_mcs_80 = 9;
for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
u8 mcs_80 = (mcs_80_map >> (2 * i)) & 3;
base-commit: d4d13947306ab3c98c84389d9397563b550b71b8
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 2:35 Baochen Qiang [this message]
2024-02-02 17:35 ` [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: initialize rx_mcs_80 and rx_mcs_160 before use Jeff Johnson
2024-02-05 17:00 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202023547.11141-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).