b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc>
To: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: cfg80211: Lock wiphy in cfg80211_get_station
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:43:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cef03d6c-7be8-4527-b38b-eadca2789f9b@unstable.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <983b24a6a176e0800c01aedcd74480d9b551cb13.1716046653.git.repk@triplefau.lt>

Hi,

On 18/05/2024 17:50, Remi Pommarel wrote:
> Wiphy should be locked before calling rdev_get_station() (see lockdep
> assert in ieee80211_get_station()).

Adding the lock is fine as nowadays it is taken in pre_doit and released 
in post_doit (with some exceptions). Therefore when invoking 
.get_station from a side path the lock should be taken too.

It was actually a05829a7222e9d10c416dd2dbbf3929fe6646b89 that introduced 
this requirement AFAICS.

> 
> This fixes the following kernel NULL dereference:

As already said by Johannes, I am not sure it truly fixes this NULL 
dereference though.

Have you checked where in ath10k_sta_statistics this is exactly 
happening? Do you think some sta was partly released and thus fields 
were NULLified?

Regards,


-- 
Antonio Quartulli

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-21  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-18 15:50 [PATCH] wifi: cfg80211: Lock wiphy in cfg80211_get_station Remi Pommarel
2024-05-21  7:01 ` Nicolas Escande
2024-05-21  7:12 ` Johannes Berg
2024-05-21  7:43 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2024-05-21 12:15   ` Remi Pommarel
2024-05-21 14:51     ` Antonio Quartulli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cef03d6c-7be8-4527-b38b-eadca2789f9b@unstable.cc \
    --to=a@unstable.cc \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).