BPF Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	agordeev@linux.ibm.com, puranjay12@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] s390/bpf: Emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <171555842991.18024.15096430616731560463.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507000557.12048-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Tue,  7 May 2024 02:02:49 +0200 you wrote:
> BPF_ATOMIC_OP() macro documentation states that "BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH"
> should be the same as atomic_fetch_add(), which is currently not the
> case on s390x: the serialization instruction "bcr 14,0" is missing.
> This applies to "and", "or" and "xor" variants too.
> 
> s390x is allowed to reorder stores with subsequent fetches from
> different addresses, so code relying on BPF_FETCH acting as a barrier,
> for example:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] s390/bpf: Emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/68378982f0b2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07  0:02 [PATCH bpf-next v2] s390/bpf: Emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-05-07 11:10 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-05-13  0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=171555842991.18024.15096430616731560463.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).