BPF Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH stable, 6.1] net: sockmap, fix missing MSG_MORE causing TCP disruptions
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 09:48:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240503164805.59970-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com> (raw)

[ Upstream commit ebf2e8860eea66e2c4764316b80c6a5ee5f336ee]
[ Upstream commit f8dd95b29d7ef08c19ec9720564acf72243ddcf6]

In the first patch,

ebf2e8860eea ("tcp_bpf: Inline do_tcp_sendpages as it's now a wrapper around tcp_sendmsg")

This block of code is added to tcp_bpf_push(). The
tcp_bpf_push is the code used by BPF to submit messages into the TCP
stack.

 if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
     msghdr.msg_flags | MSG_MORE;

In the second patch,

f8dd95b29d7e ("tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp, siw: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage")

this logic was further changed to,

  if (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)
     msghdr.msg_flags |= MSG_MORE

This was done as part of an improvement to use the sendmsg() callbacks
and remove the sendpage usage inside the various sub systems.

However, these two patches together fixed a bug. The issue is without
MSG_MORE set we will break a msg up into many smaller sends. In some
case a lot because the operation loops over the scatter gather list.
Without the MSG_MORE set (the current 6.1 case) we see stalls in data
send/recv and sometimes applications failing to receive data. This
generally is the result of an application that gives up after calling
recv() or similar too many times. We introduce this because of how
we incorrectly change the TCP send pattern.

Now that we have both 6.5 and 6.1 stable kernels deployed we've
observed a series of issues related to this in real deployments. In 6.5
kernels all the HTTP and other compliance tests pass and we are not
observing any other issues. On 6.1 various compliance tests fail
(nginx for example), but more importantly in these clusters without
the flag set we observe stalled applications and increased retries in
other applications. Openssl users where we have annotations to monitor
retries and failures observed a significant increase in retries for
example.

For the backport we isolated the fix to the two lines in the above
patches that fixed the code. With this patch we deployed the workloads
again and error rates and stalls went away and 6.1 stable kernels
perform similar to 6.5 stable kernels. Similarly the compliance tests
also passed.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.1.x
Fixes: 604326b41a6fb ("tcp_bpf, smc, tls, espintcp, siw: Reduce MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST usage")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index f8037d142bb7..20d94f67fde2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ static int tcp_bpf_push(struct sock *sk, struct sk_msg *msg, u32 apply_bytes,
 
 		tcp_rate_check_app_limited(sk);
 retry:
+		if (size < sge->length && msg->sg.start != msg->sg.end)
+			flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST;
+
 		has_tx_ulp = tls_sw_has_ctx_tx(sk);
 		if (has_tx_ulp) {
 			flags |= MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY;
-- 
2.33.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 16:48 John Fastabend [this message]
2024-05-03 18:16 ` [PATCH stable, 6.1] net: sockmap, fix missing MSG_MORE causing TCP disruptions Daniel Borkmann
2024-05-04  7:30 ` Greg KH
2024-05-04 16:48   ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240503164805.59970-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).