BPF Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	david.faust@oracle.com, cupertino.miranda@oracle.com,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next V3] bpf: avoid UB in usages of the __imm_insn macro
Date: Wed,  8 May 2024 12:35:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508103551.14955-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> (raw)

[Changes from V2:
 - no-strict-aliasing is only applied when building with GCC.
 - cpumask_failure.c is excluded, as it doesn't use __imm_insn.]

The __imm_insn macro is defined in bpf_misc.h as:

  #define __imm_insn(name, expr) [name]"i"(*(long *)&(expr))

This may lead to type-punning and strict aliasing rules violations in
it's typical usage where the address of a struct bpf_insn is passed as
expr, like in:

  __imm_insn(st_mem,
             BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 42))

Where:

  #define BPF_ST_MEM(SIZE, DST, OFF, IMM)				\
	((struct bpf_insn) {					\
		.code  = BPF_ST | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_MEM,	\
		.dst_reg = DST,					\
		.src_reg = 0,					\
		.off   = OFF,					\
		.imm   = IMM })

In all the actual instances of this in the BPF selftests the value is
fed to a volatile asm statement as soon as it gets read from memory,
and thus it is unlikely anti-aliasing rules breakage may lead to
misguided optimizations.

However, GCC detects the potential problem (indirectly) by issuing a
warning stating that a temporary <Uxxxxxx> is used uninitialized,
where the temporary corresponds to the memory read by *(long *).

This patch adds -fno-strict-aliasing to the compilation flags of the
particular selftests that do type punning via __imm_insn, only for
GCC.

Tested in master bpf-next.
No regressions.

Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: david.faust@oracle.com
Cc: cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 511ea84139a3..e962a0bd8a78 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -86,6 +86,19 @@ progs/btf_dump_test_case_namespacing.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -Wno-error
 progs/btf_dump_test_case_packing.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -Wno-error
 progs/btf_dump_test_case_padding.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -Wno-error
 progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -Wno-error
+
+# The following tests do type-punning, via the __imm_insn macro, from
+# `struct bpf_insn' to long and then uses the value.  This triggers an
+# "is used uninitialized" warning in GCC due to strict-aliasing
+# rules.
+progs/verifier_ref_tracking.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_unpriv.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_cgroup_storage.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_ld_ind.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_map_ret_val.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_spill_fill.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_subprog_precision.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
+progs/verifier_uninit.c-bpf_gcc-CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing
 endif
 
 ifneq ($(CLANG_CPUV4),)
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08 10:35 Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-05-08 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V3] bpf: avoid UB in usages of the __imm_insn macro Yonghong Song
2024-05-08 17:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240508103551.14955-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).