From: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v16 01/20] security: add ipe lsm
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:17:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1711657047-10526-2-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1711657047-10526-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) is an LSM that provides an
complimentary approach to Mandatory Access Control than existing LSMs
today.
Existing LSMs have centered around the concept of access to a resource
should be controlled by the current user's credentials. IPE's approach,
is that access to a resource should be controlled by the system's trust
of a current resource.
The basis of this approach is defining a global policy to specify which
resource can be trusted.
Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
---
v2:
+ Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
interface to pass mailing list character limit
v3:
+ Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
+ Remove useless 0-initializations
+ Prefix extern variables with ipe_
+ Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
exposed through sysctls.
+ Add more prose to the IPE base config option
help text.
+ Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
+ Remove unnecessary caching system.
+ Remove comments from headers
+ Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
+ Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
+ Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12
v4:
+ Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
+ Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
exposed through securityfs.
+ Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.
v5:
+ fix minor grammatical errors
+ do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
reconstruct the exact rule.
v6:
+ No changes
v7:
+ Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.
+ Introduce the concept of an ipe_context, a scoped way to
introduce execution policies, used initially for allowing for
kunit tests in isolation.
v8:
+ Follow lsmname_hook_name convention for lsm hooks.
+ Move LSM blob accessors to ipe.c and mark LSM blobs as static.
v9:
+ Remove ipe_context for simplification
v10:
+ Add github url
v11:
+ Correct github url
+ Move ipe before bpf
v12:
+ Switch to use lsm_id instead of string for lsm name
v13:
+ No changes
v14:
+ No changes
v15:
+ Add missing code in tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
v16:
+ No changes
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 ++++
include/uapi/linux/lsm.h | 1 +
security/Kconfig | 11 ++---
security/Makefile | 1 +
security/ipe/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++
security/ipe/Makefile | 9 ++++
security/ipe/ipe.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
security/ipe/ipe.h | 16 ++++++++
security/security.c | 3 +-
.../selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c | 3 ++
10 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 security/ipe/Kconfig
create mode 100644 security/ipe/Makefile
create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.c
create mode 100644 security/ipe/ipe.h
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 079a86e680bc..16e29f2361c9 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -10744,6 +10744,13 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
F: security/integrity/
F: security/integrity/ima/
+INTEGRITY POLICY ENFORCEMENT (IPE)
+M: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
+L: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
+S: Supported
+T: git https://github.com/microsoft/ipe.git
+F: security/ipe/
+
INTEL 810/815 FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
M: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
L: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
index 33d8c9f4aa6b..938593dfd5da 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lsm.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct lsm_ctx {
#define LSM_ID_LANDLOCK 110
#define LSM_ID_IMA 111
#define LSM_ID_EVM 112
+#define LSM_ID_IPE 113
/*
* LSM_ATTR_XXX definitions identify different LSM attributes
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 412e76f1575d..9fb8f9b14972 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ source "security/yama/Kconfig"
source "security/safesetid/Kconfig"
source "security/lockdown/Kconfig"
source "security/landlock/Kconfig"
+source "security/ipe/Kconfig"
source "security/integrity/Kconfig"
@@ -231,11 +232,11 @@ endchoice
config LSM
string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs"
- default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
- default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
- default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
- default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
- default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf"
+ default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
+ default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
+ default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,tomoyo,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
+ default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,ipe,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
+ default "landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,ipe,bpf"
help
A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order.
Any LSMs left off this list, except for those with order
diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index 59f238490665..cc0982214b84 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown/
obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUPS) += device_cgroup.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf/
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) += landlock/
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += ipe/
# Object integrity file lists
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity/
diff --git a/security/ipe/Kconfig b/security/ipe/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4875fb04883
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) configuration
+#
+
+menuconfig SECURITY_IPE
+ bool "Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE)"
+ depends on SECURITY && SECURITYFS
+ select PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
+ select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+ help
+ This option enables the Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM
+ allowing users to define a policy to enforce a trust-based access
+ control. A key feature of IPE is a customizable policy to allow
+ admins to reconfigure trust requirements on the fly.
+
+ If unsure, answer N.
diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f7a80d0f18f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+#
+# Makefile for building the IPE module as part of the kernel tree.
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \
+ ipe.o \
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.c b/security/ipe/ipe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b013aed15e73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+#include <uapi/linux/lsm.h>
+
+#include "ipe.h"
+
+static struct lsm_blob_sizes ipe_blobs __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+static const struct lsm_id ipe_lsmid = {
+ .name = "ipe",
+ .id = LSM_ID_IPE,
+};
+
+static struct security_hook_list ipe_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
+};
+
+/**
+ * ipe_init - Entry point of IPE.
+ *
+ * This is called at LSM init, which happens occurs early during kernel
+ * start up. During this phase, IPE registers its hooks and loads the
+ * builtin boot policy.
+ * Return:
+ * * 0 - OK
+ * * -ENOMEM - Out of memory
+ */
+static int __init ipe_init(void)
+{
+ security_add_hooks(ipe_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(ipe_hooks), &ipe_lsmid);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_LSM(ipe) = {
+ .name = "ipe",
+ .init = ipe_init,
+ .blobs = &ipe_blobs,
+};
diff --git a/security/ipe/ipe.h b/security/ipe/ipe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a1c68d0fc2e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/ipe/ipe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _IPE_H
+#define _IPE_H
+
+#ifdef pr_fmt
+#undef pr_fmt
+#endif
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "IPE: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
+
+#endif /* _IPE_H */
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 7e118858b545..287bfac6b471 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) ? 1 : 0) + \
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK) ? 1 : 0) + \
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA) ? 1 : 0) + \
- (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVM) ? 1 : 0))
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EVM) ? 1 : 0) + \
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) ? 1 : 0))
/*
* These are descriptions of the reasons that can be passed to the
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
index 06d24d4679a6..1cc8a977c711 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c
@@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ TEST(correct_lsm_list_modules)
case LSM_ID_EVM:
name = "evm";
break;
+ case LSM_ID_IPE:
+ name = "ipe";
+ break;
default:
name = "INVALID";
break;
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 20:17 [PATCH v16 00/20] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` Fan Wu [this message]
2024-03-28 20:45 ` [PATCH v16 01/20] security: add ipe lsm Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 22:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-03-30 11:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 02/20] ipe: add policy parser Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 20:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 03/20] ipe: add evaluation loop Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 04/20] ipe: add LSM hooks on execution and kernel read Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 05/20] initramfs|security: Add a security hook to do_populate_rootfs() Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 06/20] ipe: introduce 'boot_verified' as a trust provider Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 07/20] security: add new securityfs delete function Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 08/20] ipe: add userspace interface Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 09/20] uapi|audit|ipe: add ipe auditing support Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 10/20] ipe: add permissive toggle Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 11/20] block|security: add LSM blob to block_device Fan Wu
2024-03-30 11:26 ` kernel test robot
2024-04-02 1:26 ` Paul Moore
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 12/20] dm: add finalize hook to target_type Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 13/20] dm verity: consume root hash digest and signature data via LSM hook Fan Wu
2024-04-02 1:26 ` Paul Moore
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 14/20] ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2024-04-02 1:26 ` Paul Moore
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 15/20] security: add security_inode_setintegrity() hook Fan Wu
2024-04-02 1:26 ` Paul Moore
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 16/20] fsverity: consume fsverity built-in signatures via LSM hook Fan Wu
2024-04-03 5:02 ` Eric Biggers
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 17/20] ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2024-04-03 5:10 ` Eric Biggers
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 18/20] scripts: add boot policy generation program Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 19/20] ipe: kunit test for parser Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v16 20/20] documentation: add ipe documentation Fan Wu
2024-03-28 20:36 ` [PATCH v16 00/20] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-03-28 20:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1711657047-10526-2-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).