* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
@ 2021-02-26 8:14 Xiaoyun Li
2021-03-02 6:53 ` Xing, Beilei
2021-03-02 7:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xiaoyun Li
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyun Li @ 2021-02-26 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: dev, beilei.xing, jia.guo, Emma.Finn; +Cc: Xiaoyun Li, stable
IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the
spec value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset
field then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
This patch allows the above rules.
Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
index 4d44282312..86d96d9a11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_item *item = pattern;
const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_spec, *eth_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_vlan *vlan_spec, *vlan_mask;
- const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *ipv4_spec, *ipv4_mask;
+ const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *ipv4_spec, *ipv4_last, *ipv4_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 *ipv6_spec, *ipv6_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_spec, *tcp_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec, *udp_mask;
@@ -2446,7 +2446,6 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
uint8_t pctype = 0;
uint64_t input_set = I40E_INSET_NONE;
- uint16_t frag_off;
enum rte_flow_item_type item_type;
enum rte_flow_item_type next_type;
enum rte_flow_item_type l3 = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
@@ -2472,7 +2471,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
memset(len_arr, 0, sizeof(len_arr));
filter->input.flow_ext.customized_pctype = false;
for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
- if (item->last) {
+ if (item->last && item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
item,
@@ -2611,15 +2610,40 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
l3 = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4;
ipv4_spec = item->spec;
ipv4_mask = item->mask;
+ ipv4_last = item->last;
pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_NONF_IPV4_OTHER;
layer_idx = I40E_FLXPLD_L3_IDX;
+ if (ipv4_last) {
+ if (!ipv4_spec || !ipv4_mask || !outer_ip) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Not support range");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ /* Only fragment_offset supports range */
+ if (ipv4_last->hdr.version_ihl ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.type_of_service ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.total_length ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.packet_id ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.time_to_live ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.next_proto_id ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.hdr_checksum ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.src_addr ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.dst_addr) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Not support range");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ }
if (ipv4_spec && ipv4_mask && outer_ip) {
/* Check IPv4 mask and update input set */
if (ipv4_mask->hdr.version_ihl ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.total_length ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.packet_id ||
- ipv4_mask->hdr.fragment_offset ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.hdr_checksum) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
@@ -2640,11 +2664,58 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
input_set |= I40E_INSET_IPV4_PROTO;
/* Check if it is fragment. */
- frag_off = ipv4_spec->hdr.fragment_offset;
- frag_off = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_off);
- if (frag_off & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK ||
- frag_off & RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG)
- pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
+ uint16_t frag_mask =
+ ipv4_mask->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ uint16_t frag_spec =
+ ipv4_spec->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ uint16_t frag_last = 0;
+ if (ipv4_last)
+ frag_last =
+ ipv4_last->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ if (frag_mask) {
+ frag_mask = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_mask);
+ frag_spec = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_spec);
+ frag_last = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_last);
+ /* frag_off mask has to be 0x3fff */
+ if (frag_mask !=
+ (RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK |
+ RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG)) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid IPv4 "
+ "fragment_offset mask");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ /*
+ * non-frag rule:
+ * mask=0x3fff,sepc=0
+ * frag rule:
+ * mask=0x3fff,spec=0x8,last=0x2000
+ */
+ if (frag_spec ==
+ (1 << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT) &&
+ frag_last == RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG) {
+ pctype =
+ I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
+ } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid IPv4 "
+ "fragment_offset rule");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid fragment_offset");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_DMAC | I40E_INSET_SMAC)) {
if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_IPV4_SRC |
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
2021-02-26 8:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue Xiaoyun Li
@ 2021-03-02 6:53 ` Xing, Beilei
2021-03-02 7:06 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-02 7:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xiaoyun Li
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xing, Beilei @ 2021-03-02 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Li, Xiaoyun, dev@dpdk.org, Guo, Jia, Finn, Emma; +Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 4:15 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> <jia.guo@intel.com>; Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
>
> IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec value
> was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field then both
> non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
>
> But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
> Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
> Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
> Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
> Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
>
> This patch allows the above rules.
>
> Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c index
> 4d44282312..86d96d9a11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> + "Invalid IPv4 "
> + "fragment_offset mask");
Needn't split the comments line.
> + return -rte_errno;
> + }
> + /*
> + * non-frag rule:
> + * mask=0x3fff,sepc=0
Typo: sepc->spec
> + * frag rule:
> + * mask=0x3fff,spec=0x8,last=0x2000
> + */
> + if (frag_spec ==
> + (1 << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT) &&
> + frag_last ==
> RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG) {
> + pctype =
> +
> I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
> + } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
> + rte_flow_error_set(error,
> + EINVAL,
> +
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> + item,
> + "Invalid IPv4 "
> + "fragment_offset rule");
Same as above.
> + return -rte_errno;
> + }
> + } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
> + rte_flow_error_set(error,
> + EINVAL,
> +
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> + item,
> + "Invalid fragment_offset");
> + return -rte_errno;
> + }
>
> if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_DMAC |
> I40E_INSET_SMAC)) {
> if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_IPV4_SRC
> |
> --
> 2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
2021-02-26 8:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue Xiaoyun Li
2021-03-02 6:53 ` Xing, Beilei
@ 2021-03-02 7:03 ` Xiaoyun Li
2021-03-02 7:16 ` Xing, Beilei
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyun Li @ 2021-03-02 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Beilei Xing, Jeff Guo, Wenzhuo Lu; +Cc: dev, Xiaoyun Li, stable
IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the
spec value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset
field then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
This patch allows the above rules.
Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
---
v2:
* Fixed a typo.
* Print comment in one line.
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
index 4d44282312..3e514d5f38 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_item *item = pattern;
const struct rte_flow_item_eth *eth_spec, *eth_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_vlan *vlan_spec, *vlan_mask;
- const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *ipv4_spec, *ipv4_mask;
+ const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *ipv4_spec, *ipv4_last, *ipv4_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 *ipv6_spec, *ipv6_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_spec, *tcp_mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec, *udp_mask;
@@ -2446,7 +2446,6 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
uint8_t pctype = 0;
uint64_t input_set = I40E_INSET_NONE;
- uint16_t frag_off;
enum rte_flow_item_type item_type;
enum rte_flow_item_type next_type;
enum rte_flow_item_type l3 = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END;
@@ -2472,7 +2471,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
memset(len_arr, 0, sizeof(len_arr));
filter->input.flow_ext.customized_pctype = false;
for (; item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END; item++) {
- if (item->last) {
+ if (item->last && item->type != RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
item,
@@ -2611,15 +2610,40 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
l3 = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4;
ipv4_spec = item->spec;
ipv4_mask = item->mask;
+ ipv4_last = item->last;
pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_NONF_IPV4_OTHER;
layer_idx = I40E_FLXPLD_L3_IDX;
+ if (ipv4_last) {
+ if (!ipv4_spec || !ipv4_mask || !outer_ip) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Not support range");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ /* Only fragment_offset supports range */
+ if (ipv4_last->hdr.version_ihl ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.type_of_service ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.total_length ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.packet_id ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.time_to_live ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.next_proto_id ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.hdr_checksum ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.src_addr ||
+ ipv4_last->hdr.dst_addr) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Not support range");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ }
if (ipv4_spec && ipv4_mask && outer_ip) {
/* Check IPv4 mask and update input set */
if (ipv4_mask->hdr.version_ihl ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.total_length ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.packet_id ||
- ipv4_mask->hdr.fragment_offset ||
ipv4_mask->hdr.hdr_checksum) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
@@ -2640,11 +2664,56 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
input_set |= I40E_INSET_IPV4_PROTO;
/* Check if it is fragment. */
- frag_off = ipv4_spec->hdr.fragment_offset;
- frag_off = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_off);
- if (frag_off & RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK ||
- frag_off & RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG)
- pctype = I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
+ uint16_t frag_mask =
+ ipv4_mask->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ uint16_t frag_spec =
+ ipv4_spec->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ uint16_t frag_last = 0;
+ if (ipv4_last)
+ frag_last =
+ ipv4_last->hdr.fragment_offset;
+ if (frag_mask) {
+ frag_mask = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_mask);
+ frag_spec = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_spec);
+ frag_last = rte_be_to_cpu_16(frag_last);
+ /* frag_off mask has to be 0x3fff */
+ if (frag_mask !=
+ (RTE_IPV4_HDR_OFFSET_MASK |
+ RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG)) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid IPv4 fragment_offset mask");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ /*
+ * non-frag rule:
+ * mask=0x3fff,spec=0
+ * frag rule:
+ * mask=0x3fff,spec=0x8,last=0x2000
+ */
+ if (frag_spec ==
+ (1 << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT) &&
+ frag_last == RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG) {
+ pctype =
+ I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
+ } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid IPv4 fragment_offset rule");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error,
+ EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Invalid fragment_offset");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_DMAC | I40E_INSET_SMAC)) {
if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_IPV4_SRC |
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
2021-03-02 6:53 ` Xing, Beilei
@ 2021-03-02 7:06 ` Li, Xiaoyun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li, Xiaoyun @ 2021-03-02 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Xing, Beilei, dev@dpdk.org, Guo, Jia, Finn, Emma; +Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Hi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 14:54
> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia
> <jia.guo@intel.com>; Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 4:15 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> > <jia.guo@intel.com>; Finn, Emma <emma.finn@intel.com>
> > Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
> >
> > IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec
> > value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field
> > then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
> >
> > But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
> > Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
> > Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
> > Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
> > Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
> >
> > This patch allows the above rules.
> >
> > Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 89
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c index
> > 4d44282312..86d96d9a11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
>
>
> > + "Invalid IPv4 "
> > + "fragment_offset mask");
>
> Needn't split the comments line.
>
> > + return -rte_errno;
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * non-frag rule:
> > + * mask=0x3fff,sepc=0
>
> Typo: sepc->spec
>
> > + * frag rule:
> > + * mask=0x3fff,spec=0x8,last=0x2000
> > + */
> > + if (frag_spec ==
> > + (1 << RTE_IPV4_HDR_FO_SHIFT) &&
> > + frag_last ==
> > RTE_IPV4_HDR_MF_FLAG) {
> > + pctype =
> > +
> > I40E_FILTER_PCTYPE_FRAG_IPV4;
> > + } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
> > + rte_flow_error_set(error,
> > + EINVAL,
> > +
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> > + item,
> > + "Invalid IPv4 "
> > + "fragment_offset rule");
>
> Same as above.
>
> > + return -rte_errno;
> > + }
> > + } else if (frag_spec || frag_last) {
> > + rte_flow_error_set(error,
> > + EINVAL,
> > +
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> > + item,
> > + "Invalid fragment_offset");
> > + return -rte_errno;
> > + }
> >
> > if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_DMAC |
> > I40E_INSET_SMAC)) {
> > if (input_set & (I40E_INSET_IPV4_SRC
> > |
> > --
> > 2.25.1
Thanks for the review. Will update them in v2.
BRs
Xiaoyun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
2021-03-02 7:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xiaoyun Li
@ 2021-03-02 7:16 ` Xing, Beilei
2021-03-05 8:56 ` Zhang, Qi Z
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xing, Beilei @ 2021-03-02 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Li, Xiaoyun, Guo, Jia, Lu, Wenzhuo; +Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:03 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Lu,
> Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
>
> IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec value
> was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field then both
> non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
>
> But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
> Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
> Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
> Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
> Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
>
> This patch allows the above rules.
>
> Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
2021-03-02 7:16 ` Xing, Beilei
@ 2021-03-05 8:56 ` Zhang, Qi Z
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2021-03-05 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Xing, Beilei, Li, Xiaoyun, Guo, Jia, Lu, Wenzhuo
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:17 PM
> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Lu,
> Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:03 PM
> > To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> > <jia.guo@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
> >
> > IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec
> > value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field
> > then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
> >
> > But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
> > Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
> > Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
> > Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
> > Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
> >
> > This patch allows the above rules.
> >
> > Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-05 8:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-26 8:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue Xiaoyun Li
2021-03-02 6:53 ` Xing, Beilei
2021-03-02 7:06 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-02 7:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xiaoyun Li
2021-03-02 7:16 ` Xing, Beilei
2021-03-05 8:56 ` Zhang, Qi Z
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).