From: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Fu <vincentfu@gmail.com>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using fio with adjusted parameters for use case "DB"
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:46:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f93974c-e374-cae4-f165-d81583c5441f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c048da7e-ab6d-0209-52b9-5d4262658ab0@gmail.com>
Hello,
thanks for your reply.
I have discussed with DB developers which values should be used for
- iodepth and
- numjobs
With regards to iodepth I was told that a max. value could be defined in
DB's global ini; the default is 512.
This means the DB could use this queue depth as max. but certainly no as
average.
Question:
From your experience, does it make sense to run IO benchmark with
iodepth=512?
THX
Am 07.03.2023 um 16:22 schrieb Vincent Fu:
> On 3/7/23 09:30, Thomas Schneider wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want to benchmark different storage devices with an I/O workload
>> generated by the "real" application: DB.
>>
>> A typcial command could be:
>> fio --name=random-writers --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=4
>> --rw=randwrite --bs=1024 --direct=1 --size=64m --numjobs=2 runtime=120s
>>
>> The question is regarding parameters size and runtime:
>> - What value should be used for size? Should this be the same as
>> allocated disk space by DB data files? Or just a (reasonable) portion
>> of this? DB data files could be up to xTB.
>> - Is it advisable to use runtime? If yes, would this somehow
>> contradict to size, means if I use a larger size, then runtime is
>> obviously longer.
>>
>
> The documentation for runtime is here:
>
> https://fio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-runtime
>
> Fio will write within the LBAs bounded by offset and size and stop
> when it has touched all the LBAs or when runtime is attained. Run some
> experiments with --debug=io to better understand fio's behavior.
>
> Also take a look at the example job files for help:
>
> https://github.com/axboe/fio/tree/master/examples
>
> Vincent
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-07 14:30 Using fio with adjusted parameters for use case "DB" Thomas Schneider
2023-03-07 15:22 ` Vincent Fu
2023-03-08 13:46 ` Thomas Schneider [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-02 9:49 74cmonty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f93974c-e374-cae4-f165-d81583c5441f@gmail.com \
--to=74cmonty@gmail.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincentfu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).