From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@kernel.org>,
"Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@ionkov.net>,
"Dominique Martinet" <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
"Christian Schoenebeck" <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Marc Dionne" <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
"Xiubo Li" <xiubli@redhat.com>,
"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"Alexander Aring" <aahringo@redhat.com>,
"David Teigland" <teigland@redhat.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"Andreas Gruenbacher" <agruenba@redhat.com>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"Olga Kornievskaia" <kolga@netapp.com>,
"Dai Ngo" <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, "Tom Talpey" <tom@talpey.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
"Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
"Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Steve French" <sfrench@samba.org>,
"Paulo Alcantara" <pc@manguebit.com>,
"Ronnie Sahlberg" <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
"Shyam Prasad N" <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
"Namjae Jeon" <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] filelock: convert the IS_* macros to take file_lock_core
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:16:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170544341684.23031.11038222640477022046@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116-flsplit-v1-11-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I couldn't get them to work properly as macros, so convert them
> to static inlines instead (which is probably better for the type safety
> anyway).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 770aaa5809ba..eddf4d767d5d 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -70,10 +70,26 @@
>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> -#define IS_POSIX(fl) (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_POSIX)
Used 3 times... once as
if (IS_POSIX(blocker) && !IS_OFDLCK(blocker))
Can an IS_POSIX lock also be IS_OFDLCK ??
> -#define IS_FLOCK(fl) (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_FLOCK)
Used once.
> -#define IS_LEASE(fl) (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & (FL_LEASE|FL_DELEG|FL_LAYOUT))
Used twice. Either "IS_LEASE" approves things that aren't leases, or
FL_LEASE is not set on all leases.... Names could be improved.
> -#define IS_OFDLCK(fl) (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_OFDLCK)
used 4 times - a clear winner :-)
If it would me, I would simply discard these macros and open-code the
tests. I don't think IS_FLOCK() is easier to read for someone who knows
the code, and I think IS_LEASE() is actually harder to read for someone
who doesn't know the code, as that it does it not really obvious.
But this is just a suggestion, I won't push it.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> +static inline bool IS_POSIX(struct file_lock_core *flc)
> +{
> + return flc->fl_flags & FL_POSIX;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool IS_FLOCK(struct file_lock_core *flc)
> +{
> + return flc->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool IS_OFDLCK(struct file_lock_core *flc)
> +{
> + return flc->fl_flags & FL_OFDLCK;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool IS_LEASE(struct file_lock_core *flc)
> +{
> + return flc->fl_flags & (FL_LEASE|FL_DELEG|FL_LAYOUT);
> +}
> +
> #define IS_REMOTELCK(fl) (fl->fl_core.fl_pid <= 0)
>
> static bool lease_breaking(struct file_lock *fl)
> @@ -761,6 +777,7 @@ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker,
> struct file_lock *))
> {
> struct file_lock *fl;
> + struct file_lock_core *bflc;
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_core.fl_blocked_member));
>
> new_blocker:
> @@ -773,7 +790,9 @@ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker,
> waiter->fl_core.fl_blocker = blocker;
> list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_core.fl_blocked_member,
> &blocker->fl_core.fl_blocked_requests);
> - if (IS_POSIX(blocker) && !IS_OFDLCK(blocker))
> +
> + bflc = &blocker->fl_core;
> + if (IS_POSIX(bflc) && !IS_OFDLCK(bflc))
> locks_insert_global_blocked(&waiter->fl_core);
>
> /* The requests in waiter->fl_blocked are known to conflict with
> @@ -998,6 +1017,7 @@ static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> struct file_lock *block_fl)
> {
> int i = 0;
> + struct file_lock_core *flc = &caller_fl->fl_core;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&blocked_lock_lock);
>
> @@ -1005,7 +1025,7 @@ static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> * This deadlock detector can't reasonably detect deadlocks with
> * FL_OFDLCK locks, since they aren't owned by a process, per-se.
> */
> - if (IS_OFDLCK(caller_fl))
> + if (IS_OFDLCK(flc))
> return 0;
>
> while ((block_fl = what_owner_is_waiting_for(block_fl))) {
> @@ -2157,7 +2177,7 @@ static pid_t locks_translate_pid(struct file_lock *fl, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> pid_t vnr;
> struct pid *pid;
>
> - if (IS_OFDLCK(fl))
> + if (IS_OFDLCK(&fl->fl_core))
> return -1;
> if (IS_REMOTELCK(fl))
> return fl->fl_core.fl_pid;
> @@ -2721,19 +2741,19 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
> if (repeat)
> seq_printf(f, "%*s", repeat - 1 + (int)strlen(pfx), pfx);
>
> - if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
> + if (IS_POSIX(&fl->fl_core)) {
> if (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_ACCESS)
> seq_puts(f, "ACCESS");
> - else if (IS_OFDLCK(fl))
> + else if (IS_OFDLCK(&fl->fl_core))
> seq_puts(f, "OFDLCK");
> else
> seq_puts(f, "POSIX ");
>
> seq_printf(f, " %s ",
> (inode == NULL) ? "*NOINODE*" : "ADVISORY ");
> - } else if (IS_FLOCK(fl)) {
> + } else if (IS_FLOCK(&fl->fl_core)) {
> seq_puts(f, "FLOCK ADVISORY ");
> - } else if (IS_LEASE(fl)) {
> + } else if (IS_LEASE(&fl->fl_core)) {
> if (fl->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_DELEG)
> seq_puts(f, "DELEG ");
> else
> @@ -2748,7 +2768,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
> } else {
> seq_puts(f, "UNKNOWN UNKNOWN ");
> }
> - type = IS_LEASE(fl) ? target_leasetype(fl) : fl->fl_core.fl_type;
> + type = IS_LEASE(&fl->fl_core) ? target_leasetype(fl) : fl->fl_core.fl_type;
>
> seq_printf(f, "%s ", (type == F_WRLCK) ? "WRITE" :
> (type == F_RDLCK) ? "READ" : "UNLCK");
> @@ -2760,7 +2780,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
> } else {
> seq_printf(f, "%d <none>:0 ", fl_pid);
> }
> - if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
> + if (IS_POSIX(&fl->fl_core)) {
> if (fl->fl_end == OFFSET_MAX)
> seq_printf(f, "%Ld EOF\n", fl->fl_start);
> else
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 19:45 [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 01/20] filelock: split common fields into struct file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:07 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:46 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 02/20] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 03/20] filelock: the results of the coccinelle conversion Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:10 ` Chuck Lever
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 04/20] filelock: fixups after the coccinelle changes Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 05/20] filelock: convert some internal functions to use file_lock_core instead Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 06/20] filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 07/20] filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 08/20] filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 09/20] filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 10/20] filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 11/20] filelock: convert the IS_* macros to take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:16 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-01-17 12:32 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 12/20] filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:23 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:40 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 13/20] filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:32 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:42 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 14/20] filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 15/20] filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 16/20] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 17/20] filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 18/20] filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 19/20] filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 20/20] filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:44 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:45 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Christian Brauner
2024-01-17 12:59 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 13:25 ` [PATCH 02/20] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to struct file_lock_core David Howells
2024-01-17 13:40 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:12 ` [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Chuck Lever
2024-01-17 17:32 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 18:59 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170544341684.23031.11038222640477022046@noble.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lsahlber@redhat.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).