From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 16/20] filelock: reorganize locks_delete_block and __locks_insert_block
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:46:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116-flsplit-v1-16-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240116-flsplit-v1-0-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org>
Rename the old __locks_delete_block to __locks_unlink_lock. Rename
change old locks_delete_block function to __locks_delete_block and
have it take a file_lock_core. Make locks_delete_block a simple wrapper
around __locks_delete_block.
Also, change __locks_insert_block to take struct file_lock_core, and
fix up its callers.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/locks.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 3a028a8aafeb..27160dc65d63 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ static void locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock_core *waiter)
*
* Must be called with blocked_lock_lock held.
*/
-static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter)
+static void __locks_unlink_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter)
{
locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter);
list_del_init(&waiter->fl_blocked_member);
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker)
struct file_lock_core, fl_blocked_member);
fl = file_lock(waiter);
- __locks_delete_block(waiter);
+ __locks_unlink_block(waiter);
if ((IS_POSIX(waiter) || IS_FLOCK(waiter)) &&
fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify)
fl->fl_lmops->lm_notify(fl);
@@ -714,16 +714,9 @@ static void __locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker)
}
}
-/**
- * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock
- * @waiter: the lock which was waiting
- *
- * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it.
- */
-int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl)
+static int __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock_core *waiter)
{
int status = -ENOENT;
- struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->fl_core;
/*
* If fl_blocker is NULL, it won't be set again as this thread "owns"
@@ -754,16 +747,27 @@ int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter_fl)
if (waiter->fl_blocker)
status = 0;
__locks_wake_up_blocks(waiter);
- __locks_delete_block(waiter);
+ __locks_unlink_block(waiter);
/*
* The setting of fl_blocker to NULL marks the "done" point in deleting
* a block. Paired with acquire at the top of this function.
*/
- smp_store_release(waiter->fl_blocker, NULL);
+ smp_store_release(&waiter->fl_blocker, NULL);
spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock);
return status;
}
+
+/**
+ * locks_delete_block - stop waiting for a file lock
+ * @waiter: the lock which was waiting
+ *
+ * lockd/nfsd need to disconnect the lock while working on it.
+ */
+int locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
+{
+ return __locks_delete_block(&waiter->fl_core);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block);
/* Insert waiter into blocker's block list.
@@ -781,13 +785,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block);
* waiters, and add beneath any waiter that blocks the new waiter.
* Thus wakeups don't happen until needed.
*/
-static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl,
- struct file_lock *waiter_fl,
+static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker,
+ struct file_lock_core *waiter,
bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *,
struct file_lock_core *))
{
- struct file_lock_core *blocker = &blocker_fl->fl_core;
- struct file_lock_core *waiter = &waiter_fl->fl_core;
struct file_lock_core *flc;
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_blocked_member));
@@ -812,8 +814,8 @@ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker_fl,
}
/* Must be called with flc_lock held. */
-static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker,
- struct file_lock *waiter,
+static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker,
+ struct file_lock_core *waiter,
bool conflict(struct file_lock_core *,
struct file_lock_core *))
{
@@ -1111,7 +1113,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request)
if (!(request->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_SLEEP))
goto out;
error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED;
- locks_insert_block(fl, request, flock_locks_conflict);
+ locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &request->fl_core, flock_locks_conflict);
goto out;
}
if (request->fl_core.fl_flags & FL_ACCESS)
@@ -1205,7 +1207,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
__locks_wake_up_blocks(&request->fl_core);
if (likely(!posix_locks_deadlock(request, fl))) {
error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED;
- __locks_insert_block(fl, request,
+ __locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &request->fl_core,
posix_locks_conflict);
}
spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock);
@@ -1598,7 +1600,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type)
break_time -= jiffies;
if (break_time == 0)
break_time++;
- locks_insert_block(fl, new_fl, leases_conflict);
+ locks_insert_block(&fl->fl_core, &new_fl->fl_core, leases_conflict);
trace_break_lease_block(inode, new_fl);
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 19:45 [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 01/20] filelock: split common fields into struct file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:07 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:46 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 02/20] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:45 ` [PATCH 03/20] filelock: the results of the coccinelle conversion Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:10 ` Chuck Lever
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 04/20] filelock: fixups after the coccinelle changes Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:13 ` Chuck Lever
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 05/20] filelock: convert some internal functions to use file_lock_core instead Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 06/20] filelock: convert more internal functions to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 07/20] filelock: make posix_same_owner take file_lock_core pointers Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 08/20] filelock: convert posix_owner_key to take file_lock_core arg Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 09/20] filelock: make locks_{insert,delete}_global_locks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 10/20] filelock: convert locks_{insert,delete}_global_blocked Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 11/20] filelock: convert the IS_* macros to take file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:16 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:32 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 12/20] filelock: make __locks_delete_block and __locks_wake_up_blocks " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:23 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:40 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 13/20] filelock: convert __locks_insert_block, conflict and deadlock checks to use file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:32 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:42 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 14/20] filelock: convert fl_blocker to file_lock_core Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 15/20] filelock: clean up locks_delete_block internals Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 17/20] filelock: make assign_type helper take a file_lock_core pointer Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 18/20] filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to " Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 19/20] filelock: convert locks_insert_lock_ctx and locks_delete_lock_ctx Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH 20/20] filelock: split leases out of struct file_lock Jeff Layton
2024-01-16 22:44 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-17 12:45 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Christian Brauner
2024-01-17 12:59 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 13:25 ` [PATCH 02/20] filelock: add coccinelle scripts to move fields to struct file_lock_core David Howells
2024-01-17 13:40 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 15:12 ` [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs Chuck Lever
2024-01-17 17:32 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 18:59 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240116-flsplit-v1-16-c9d0f4370a5d@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lsahlber@redhat.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).