From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f182.google.com (mail-yw1-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A521F2A1A4 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 22:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RdC49szO" Received: by mail-yw1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-59e88a28b98so1787157b3.1 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:18:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699395526; x=1700000326; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QctA7Bq+rxWAwGydWIjR1fSKNRz9s8P13IzaEYf+J9E=; b=RdC49szOfLtneeDxA8sEBDwDPZn5bfGUDPuV48bgLybqk4yusWbS8YYR+GMjdum/BG lyf2FWJJ6V471nlPYpg/K2295InsBf4M0YHapf2Bqsa4+6zNy+9E2NmMXWEdOulZ+eNo pf/Yw2bbUOiNmoDVm5S/jUlzsQ7BYDe4y8BtBsc7ch9CcuWD4KaU/2krRXZDY9ttmQCo XPD6AN1Zk5reMR5LtcF+UjXf3JqmP5uFsyPjs7Oy2O823pfSWmbwK0D5Bgo0qbzNW+Ob s8TF8V73w1z+MBxqzWneIut64heFcOD8vc9WtG08bDZxXV0/WU1+WfXLygctMCf2EKH1 Ur7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699395526; x=1700000326; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QctA7Bq+rxWAwGydWIjR1fSKNRz9s8P13IzaEYf+J9E=; b=eVkJuekPa8z13zzrUcxz8W0y3FxBeGLx1ItPSK2JJOhOoAcyE8hQwibLWeKkUqqkUt OXPC+K+eFsbHB1UaRGSJ/tT3HT3QdYPmZxlJqm/K9S/7LA5Ls6v1go30Ko1h6rAfc85X wdOyBnqYza/bTju5/WsJe2Nt9tMx/5jJV6TQSOBApmRdsOq8gFEDQQfmfTMzMJlZfk01 IFqIl+01d6Yvx+o/P94CxMXLAq6IyzBJbwlpuIM2vB9c7x3kWGAULPf8ze/PI1l73l0v 65zppfCR6I8DjU6JqdNVrIuiXLLZ8lJ8MDc9bJTjYMb6qw/R1cyxaqP+r/YMkRX5auEE P8nQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQ8TkeJAcfRs3+oXBSCvJ57Ywd74ey6Q0kWB2fwjkxGIgrO8e1 O6rX8XRdsRIPk/rplQYT12YUdp/80t+sXUzENd8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxqhdp2l6CSzq5JgZwwhFfA23JVB1iFBQyZytpmw4JO1z6E5AAwYnmRirD6Ryy0xiKGvJOfevQySew15int/s= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d4d7:0:b0:5a7:dad3:cd21 with SMTP id w206-20020a0dd4d7000000b005a7dad3cd21mr88953ywd.10.1699395526548; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 14:18:46 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: gfs2@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231107142154.613991-1-agruenba@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 23:18:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] gfs2 fixes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Am Di., 7. Nov. 2023 um 21:31 Uhr schrieb Linus Torvalds : > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 06:22, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > > please consider pulling the following gfs2 fixes. > > You are officially on my shit-list for > > (a) claiming it's fixes > > (b) apparently lying about that fact to make it appear that it's ok > that this wasn't in linux-next and was committed within the last few > days > > about half of the commits in that pull request are very recent, > weren't in linux-next when the merge window started, and while a > couple of of them are fixes, most of them are just minor cleanups. > > DON'T LIE ABOUT THINGS. It only annoys the hell out of me when I > notice that somebody was trying to pull wool over my eyes. I apologize for referring to the entire set of commits as fixes when it's really fixes and various other things. I've said so in the tag description, but I realize now that that's not good enough. Lying about what those commits are wasn't my intention though. And I apologize for the last -minute changes. There is one commit that removes a single line of dead code which could easily have waited. The rest are fixes, but they should have been completed much sooner. That's entirely my fault. > I've pulled this and I'll let it be (because I already merged other > stuff on top), but dammit, just be honest about what happened, don't > try to claim this is somehow "fixes" and thus ok to not have gone > through linux-next. > > Or, better yet, get your ducks actually lined up before the merge window. > > Linus Thanks, Andreas