Kernel-hardening archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux-specific kernel hardening
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:21:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201006142127.GA10613@openwall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202010051538.55725193C7@keescook>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:39:26PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:26:50AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:48 PM Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> wrote:
> > > If 100% of the topics on linux-hardening are supposed to be a subset of
> > > what was on kernel-hardening, I think it'd be OK for me to provide the
> > > subscriber list to a vger admin, who would subscribe those people to
> > > linux-hardening.
> > 
> > (if folks want to go that route, probably easier to subscribe the list
> > linux-hardening@ itself to kernel-hardening@ instead of syncing
> > subscriber lists?)
> 
> Yeah, that would make things a bit simpler. Solar, would you be willing
> to do that? (Then I can tweak the wiki instructions a bit more.)

Sure, I can do that.  Should I?

Per http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-hardening there are
currently 39 subscribers on the new list.  I guess most of those are
also on kernel-hardening, and would start receiving two copies of
messages that are posted to kernel-hardening.  I guess they would then
need to unsubscribe from kernel-hardening if they want to see the
content of both lists, or to unsubscribe from linux-hardening if they
changed their mind and only want the content of kernel-hardening.  I
think this is still not too many people, so this is reasonable; if we
were to do it later, we'd inconvenience more people.

Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 17:14 Linux-specific kernel hardening Kees Cook
2020-09-29 19:25 ` Solar Designer
2020-09-29 23:41   ` Kees Cook
2020-09-30  9:02     ` Solar Designer
2020-10-05 14:14       ` Solar Designer
2020-10-05 16:02         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-10-05 16:48           ` Solar Designer
2020-10-05 22:26             ` Jann Horn
2020-10-05 22:39               ` Kees Cook
2020-10-06 14:21                 ` Solar Designer [this message]
2020-10-07  7:05                   ` Kees Cook
2020-10-05 22:23         ` Kees Cook
2020-10-07 15:16 ` Romain Perier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201006142127.GA10613@openwall.com \
    --to=solar@openwall.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).