Linux Kernel Summit discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] DRAFT Kernel Summit Track schedule
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:47:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201909051247.7B401D61@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905001230.GB25846@mit.edu>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 08:12:30PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:53:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:51:17PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 05:25:48PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > > > This is a draft kernel summit track schedule.  Please let me know of
> > > > > any potential conflicts or schedule changes that you might like to
> > > > > make.
> > > > 
> > > > Could we grab a slot for
> > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2019-July/006699.html
> > > > please? It doesn't seem to appear in the list yet.
> > > 
> > > I hadn't scheduled this because it seemed to be a fairly specialized
> > > topic, and one of the major contributors to the thread (Andy
> > > Lutomirski) won't be able to be there.  Will we have the right people
> > > to have this discussion in Lisbon?
> > 
> > I agree it would be better to have Andy there, but I don't think that's
> > reason enough to not discuss it. We had a rather large BoF meeting at LSS
> > about it with a circle of maybe 15-20 people where we made some headway
> > on understanding some of the larger requirements, but there was a lot
> > left to discuss. I know several people from that discussion will be in
> > Lisbon, though I agree it's somewhat specialized. I'm not sure what the
> > "interest level" cut-off is for a ksummit slot, but I know I'll need to
> > spend time talking with a bunch of people about it in person while I'm
> > there, so at least having some "unscheduled" slots for similar kinds of
> > discussions would be value.
> 
> OK, I've scheduled "Deep Argument Inspection and Seccomp" at 15:45 on
> Monday.  Let me know if that slot doesn't work for anyone critical who
> needs to participate.

This is great; thank you! :)

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26 21:25 [Ksummit-discuss] DRAFT Kernel Summit Track schedule Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-08-28 19:23 ` Christian Brauner
2019-08-30  3:51   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-08-30  5:53     ` Kees Cook
2019-09-05  0:12       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-09-05 19:47         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-08-28 20:13 ` Dave Airlie
2019-08-30  3:49   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-09-01  8:09     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-08-28 20:29 ` Shuah Khan
2019-08-30  3:54   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201909051247.7B401D61@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).