Linux Kernel Summit discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] New CoC and Brendan Eich
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 23:27:33 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810042323350.29948@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181004145631.5d1c3fb2@lwn.net>

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 21:39:57 +0100
> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > 	* contributor Alice gets banned from contributing, for whatever reason
> > 	* Alice finds a roothole and posts a technically valid fix
> > 	* maintainer Bob sees the posting, verifies that the bug is real, that
> > the fix is correct and that the source of that patch is banned.
> 
> So, while remedies under the CoC are yet to be determined in any sort of
> detail, I don't believe I have heard anybody talk about banning the
> acceptance of patches from anybody.  Speaking only for myself, I have a
> hard time seeing that happening in the absence of other sorts of concerns
> (the event where a would-be contributor started sending under a sock
> puppet name because nobody would consider his work anymore comes to mind).
> 
> What *is* common under CoCs in various projects is banning from specific
> fora, such as this mailing list.  But that is a different thing and
> doesn't bring about the scenario described above.

It does. Alice is banned from the mailing list, but still posts the
roothole fix to LKML and Cc's the maintainer according to the rules. LKML
drops the post, but the maintainer still gets it. Now what is he supposed
to do? Ignore it, because he forgot to add Alice to his /dev/null filter?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-04 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-04 16:23 [Ksummit-discuss] New CoC and Brendan Eich jonsmirl
2018-10-04 18:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-04 19:05   ` jonsmirl
2018-10-04 19:21     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-04 19:53       ` jonsmirl
2018-10-05  7:21       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 21:35       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-08 23:20         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-09 10:07           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-09 15:59             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-09 16:52             ` Chris Mason
2018-10-09 22:03               ` Dan Williams
2018-10-10  6:47                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-10 13:57                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 17:21                     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-10 18:28                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 19:56                         ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-10 20:12                           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:17                             ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-04 19:34     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-04 20:39   ` Al Viro
2018-10-04 20:56     ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-10-04 21:27       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-10-04 22:04         ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-10-05 16:03           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-10-04 22:05         ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-05  6:23           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-05  7:12       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-05  7:50         ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-05  9:20           ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-05  9:57             ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-05 10:45               ` Joe Perches
2018-10-05 10:55                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-05 12:59               ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-05 13:09                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-05 15:17                 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-05 18:28                   ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-05 18:39                     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-04 20:57     ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-05  7:16       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-05  7:51         ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-05  8:00           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-05  8:44             ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-05 15:26           ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1810042323350.29948@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).