KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:47:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkTnFBNsGosNYuOj@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZkG4nlwRnvz9oUXX@intel.com>

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 02:52:14PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> > Please describe it in terms of a QAPI definition, as that's what we're
> > striving for with all QEMU public interfaces. Once the QAPI design is
> > agreed, then the -object mapping is trivial, as -object's JSON format
> > supports arbitrary QAPI structures.
> 
> Thank you for your guidance!
> 
> I rethought and and modified my previous proposal:
> 
> Let me show the command examples firstly:
>   * Add a single event:
>     (x86) -object kvm-pmu-event,id=e0,action=allow,format=x86-default,\
>                   select=0x3c,umask=0x00
>     (arm or general) -object kvm-pmu-event,id=e1,action=deny,\
>                              format=raw,code=0x01
>  
>   * Add a counter bitmap:
>     (x86) -object kvm-pmu-counter,id=cnt,action=allow,type=x86-fixed,\
>                   bitmap=0xffff0000
>  
>   * Add an event list (must use Json syntax format):
>    (x86) -object '{"qom-type":"kvm-pmu-event-list","id"="filter0","action"="allow","format"="x86-default","events=[{"select"=0x3c,"umask"=0x00},{"select"=0x2e,"umask"=0x4f}]'
>    (arm) -object '{"qom-type":"kvm-pmu-event-list","id"="filter1","action"="allow","format"="raw","events"=[{"code"=0x01},{"code"=0x02}]'
> 
> 
> The specific JSON definitions are as follows (IIUC, this is "in terms of
> a QAPI definition", right? ;-)): 
> * Define PMU event and counter bitmap with JSON format:
>   - basic filter action:
> 
>   { 'enum': 'KVMPMUFilterAction',
>     'prefix': 'KVM_PMU_FILTER_ACTION',
>     'data': ['deny', 'allow' ] }
> 
>   - PMU counter:
> 
>   { 'enum': 'KVMPMUCounterType',
>     'prefix': 'KVM_PMU_COUNTER_TYPE',
>     'data': [ 'x86-fixed' ] }
> 
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMUX86FixedCounter',
>     'data': { 'bitmap': 'uint32' } }
> 
>   - PMU events (total 3 formats):
> 
>   # 3 encoding formats: "raw" is compatible with shaoqin's ARM format as
>   # well as the x86 raw format, and could support other architectures in
>   # the future.
>   { 'enum': 'KVMPMUEventEncodeFmt',
>     'prefix': 'KVM_PMU_EVENT_ENCODE_FMT',
>     'data': ['raw', 'x86-default', 'x86-masked-entry' ] }
> 
>   # A general format.
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMURawEvent',
>     'data': { 'code': 'uint64' } }
> 
>   # x86-specific
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMUX86DefalutEvent',
>     'data': { 'select': 'uint16',
>               'umask': 'uint16' } }
> 
>   # another x86 specific
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMUX86MaskedEntry',
>     'data': { 'select': 'uint16',
>               'match': 'uint8',
>               'mask': 'uint8',
>               'exclude': 'bool' } }
> 
>   # And their list wrappers:
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMURawEventList',
>     'data': { 'events': ['KVMPMURawEvent'] } }
> 
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMUX86DefalutEventList',
>     'data': { 'events': ['KVMPMUX86DefalutEvent'] } }
> 
>   { 'struct': 'KVMPMUX86MaskedEntryList',
>     'data': { 'events': ['KVMPMUX86MaskedEntryList'] } }
> 
> 
> Based on the above basic structs, we could provide 3 new more qom-types:
>   - 'kvm-pmu-counter': 'KVMPMUFilterCounter'
> 
>   # This is a single object option to configure PMU counter
>   # bitmap filter.
>   { 'union': 'KVMPMUFilterCounter',
>     'base': { 'action': 'KVMPMUFilterAction',
>               'type': 'KVMPMUCounterType' },
>     'discriminator': 'type',
>     'data': { 'x86-fixed': 'KVMPMUX86FixedCounter' } }
> 
> 
>   - 'kvm-pmu-counter': 'KVMPMUFilterCounter'
> 
>   # This option is used to configure a single PMU event for
>   # PMU filter.
>   { 'union': 'KVMPMUFilterEvent',
>     'base': { 'action': 'KVMPMUFilterAction',
>               'format': 'KVMPMUEventEncodeFmt' },
>     'discriminator': 'format',
>     'data': { 'raw': 'KVMPMURawEvent',
>               'x86-default': 'KVMPMUX86DefalutEvent',
>               'x86-masked-entry': 'KVMPMUX86MaskedEntry' } }
> 
> 
>   - 'kvm-pmu-event-list': 'KVMPMUFilterEventList'
> 
>   # Used to configure multiple events.
>   { 'union': 'KVMPMUFilterEventList',
>     'base': { 'action': 'KVMPMUFilterAction',
>               'format': 'KVMPMUEventEncodeFmt' },
>     'discriminator': 'format',
>     'data': { 'raw': 'KVMPMURawEventList',
>               'x86-default': 'KVMPMUX86DefalutEventList',
>               'x86-masked-entry': 'KVMPMUX86MaskedEntryList' } }
> 
> 
> Compared to Shaoqin's original format, kvm-pmu-event-list is not able to
> enumerate events continuously (similar to 0x00-0x30 before), and now
> user must enumerate events one by one individually.
> 
> What do you think about the above 3 new commands?

I don't know enough about KVM PMU to give feedback on the specific
choices, but in terms of how to do QAPI design, this looks like a
good start.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-09  2:49 [PATCH v9] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER Shaoqin Huang
2024-04-09  5:33 ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-09  7:47   ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-04-10  6:07     ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-16 15:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2024-04-15 17:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-07  9:33   ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-05-09  9:48   ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-09  9:39     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-13  6:52       ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-15 16:47         ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-05-27  6:41         ` Shaoqin Huang
2024-05-27 10:24           ` Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZkTnFBNsGosNYuOj@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eauger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).