From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] locking/atomic: Add missing cast to try_cmpxchg() fallbacks
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:43:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZCgxDYnyy--qdgKoAo_y7MbNSaQdbdBFefnFuMoM2OYw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZB2v+avNt52ac/+w@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 3:13 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 09:56:19PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Cast _oldp to the type of _ptr to avoid incompatible-pointer-types warning.
>
> Can you give an example of where we are passing an incompatible pointer?
An example is patch 10/10 from the series, which will fail without
this fix when fallback code is used. We have:
- } while (local_cmpxchg(&rb->head, offset, head) != offset);
+ } while (!local_try_cmpxchg(&rb->head, &offset, head));
where rb->head is defined as:
typedef struct {
atomic_long_t a;
} local_t;
while offset is defined as 'unsigned long'.
The assignment in existing try_cmpxchg template:
typeof(*(_ptr)) *___op = (_oldp)
will trigger an initialization from an incompatible pointer type error.
Please note that x86 avoids this issue by a cast in its
target-dependent definition:
#define __raw_try_cmpxchg(_ptr, _pold, _new, size, lock) \
({ \
bool success; \
__typeof__(_ptr) _old = (__typeof__(_ptr))(_pold); \
__typeof__(*(_ptr)) __old = *_old; \
__typeof__(*(_ptr)) __new = (_new); \
so, the warning/error will trigger only in the fallback code.
> That sounds indicative of a bug in the caller, but maybe I'm missing some
> reason this is necessary due to some indirection.
>
> > Fixes: 29f006fdefe6 ("asm-generic/atomic: Add try_cmpxchg() fallbacks")
>
> I'm not sure that this needs a fixes tag. Does anything go wrong today, or only
> later in this series?
The patch at [1] triggered a build error in posix_acl.c/__get.acl due
to the same problem. The compilation for x86 target was OK, because
x86 defines target-specific arch_try_cmpxchg, but the compilation
broke for targets that revert to generic support. Please note that
this specific problem was recently fixed in a different way [2], but
the issue with the fallback remains.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220714173819.13312-1-ubizjak@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221201160103.76012-1-ubizjak@gmail.com/
Uros.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-05 20:56 [PATCH 00/10] locking: Introduce local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 01/10] locking/atomic: Add missing cast to try_cmpxchg() fallbacks Uros Bizjak
2023-03-24 14:13 ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-24 15:43 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2023-03-24 16:14 ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-24 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2023-03-26 19:28 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-04-03 10:19 ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-04 12:24 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-04-04 13:19 ` Mark Rutland
2023-04-04 13:23 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 02/10] locking/atomic: Add generic try_cmpxchg{,64}_local support Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 03/10] locking/alpha: Wire up local_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 04/10] locking/loongarch: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 05/10] locking/mips: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 06/10] locking/powerpc: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 07/10] locking/x86: " Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 08/10] locking/generic: Wire up local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 09/10] locking/x86: Enable local{,64}_try_cmpxchg Uros Bizjak
2023-03-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf/ring_buffer: use local_try_cmpxchg in __perf_output_begin Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFULd4ZCgxDYnyy--qdgKoAo_y7MbNSaQdbdBFefnFuMoM2OYw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).