linux-alpha.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	 Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	 Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>,
	 Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:22:22 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2406031716490.9248@angie.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b0a434c-2165-45a0-8507-e7f992094705@paulmck-laptop>

On Fri, 31 May 2024, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> >  You're the RCU expert so you know the answer.  I don't.  If it's OK for
> > successive writes to get reordered, or readers to see a stale value, then 
> > you don't need memory barriers.  Otherwise you do.  Whether byte accesses 
> > are available or not does not matter, the CPU *will* do reordering if it's 
> > allowed to (or more specifically, it won't do anything to prevent it from 
> > happening, especially in SMP configurations; I can't remember offhand if 
> > there are cases with UP).  Also adjacent byte writes may be merged, but I 
> > suppose it does not matter, or does it?
> 
> RCU uses whichever wrapper is required.  For example, if ordering is
> required, it might use smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire().
> If ordering does not matter, it might use WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE().
> If tearing/fusing/merging does not matter, as in there are not concurrent
> accesses, it uses plain C-language loads and stores.

 Fair enough.

> >  NB MIPS has similar architectural arrangements (and a bunch of barriers 
> > defined in the ISA), it's just most implementations are actually strongly 
> > ordered, so most people can't see the effects of this.  With MIPS I know 
> > for sure there are cases of UP reordering, but they only really matter for 
> > MMIO use cases and not regular memory.
> 
> Any given architecture is required to provide architecture-specific
> implementations of the various functions that meet the requirements of
> Linux-kernel memory model.  See tools/memory-model for more information.

 This is a fairly recent addition, thank you for putting it all together.  
I used to rely solely on Documentation/memory-barriers.txt.  Thanks for 
the reference.

  Maciej

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-03 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03  8:11 [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10 Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 01/14] alpha: sort scr_mem{cpy,move}w() out Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 02/14] alpha: fix modversions for strcpy() et.al Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 03/14] alpha: add clone3() support Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 04/14] alpha: don't make functions public without a reason Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 05/14] alpha: sys_sio: fix misspelled ifdefs Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 06/14] alpha: missing includes Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 07/14] alpha: core_lca: take the unused functions out Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 08/14] alpha: jensen, t2 - make __EXTERN_INLINE same as for the rest Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 09/14] alpha: trim the unused stuff from asm-offsets.c Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 10/14] alpha: remove DECpc AXP150 (Jensen) support Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03 16:07   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-03 17:00   ` Al Viro
2024-05-03 20:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 11/14] alpha: sable: remove early machine support Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 12/14] alpha: remove LCA and APECS based machines Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 13/14] alpha: cabriolet: remove EV5 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03  8:11 ` [PATCH 14/14] alpha: drop pre-EV56 support Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-04 15:00   ` Richard Henderson
2024-05-06 10:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-03  6:02   ` Jiri Slaby
2024-06-04 13:58     ` Greg KH
2024-05-03 16:06 ` [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10 Matt Turner
2024-05-03 20:15   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-06  9:16     ` Michael Cree
2024-05-06 10:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-03 16:53 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-05-03 17:19   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-27 23:49   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-28 14:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-29 18:50       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-29 22:09         ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-30 22:59           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-31  3:56           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-31 19:33             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-03 16:22               ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2024-06-03 17:08                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-01 23:50                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-30  1:08         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-30 22:57           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-31  0:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-03 11:09               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-06-03 11:36                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2024-06-03 16:57                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-01 23:48                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-05-31 15:48         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-05-31 16:32           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-31 16:54             ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-06-01 13:51             ` David Laight
2024-07-01 23:48             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-07-02  1:13               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03  0:12                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-07-03  0:50                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-04 22:21                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2024-06-03 11:33           ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2406031716490.9248@angie.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=frank.scheiner@web.de \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).