Linux-api Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)"  <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Don't fill the kernel log with memfd_create messages
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 14:10:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d79cc64-46d8-42ab-8219-e45e8d19532f@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14b4a922-a31a-a329-0264-3d8bd101ee6b@suse.cz>

[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 04.09.23 15:31, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 8/30/23 17:52, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Recently "memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related 
>> flags" was merged. On my system, this is a regression, not an 
>> improvement, because the entire 256k kernel log buffer (default on x86) 
>> is filled with these warnings and "__do_sys_memfd_create: 122 callbacks 
>> suppressed". I haven't investigated too closely, but the most likely 
>> cause is Wayland libraries.
>>
>> This is too serious of a consequence for using an old API, especially 
>> considering how recently the flags were added. The vast majority of 
>> software has not had time to add the flags: glibc does not define the 
>> macros until 2.38 which was released less than one month ago, man-pages 
>> does not document the flags, and according to Debian Code Search, only 
>> systemd, stress-ng, and strace actually pass either of these flags.
>>
>> Furthermore, since old kernels reject unknown flags, it's not just a 
>> matter of defining and passing the flag; every program needs to 
>> add logic to handle EINVAL and try again.
>>
>> Some other way needs to be found to encourage userspace to add the 
>> flags; otherwise, this message will be patched out because the kernel 
>> log becomes unusable after running unupdated programs, which will still 
>> exist even after upstreams are fixed. In particular, AppImages, 
>> flatpaks, snaps, and similar app bundles contain vendored Wayland 
>> libraries which can be difficult or impossible to update.
> 
> It's being reverted:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230902230530.6B663C433C8@smtp.kernel.org/

in that case:

#regzbot fix: revert "memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing
exec-related flags".
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1693408388.rwssx8r1h9.none.ref@localhost>
2023-08-30 15:52 ` Don't fill the kernel log with memfd_create messages Alex Xu (Hello71)
2023-09-04 13:31   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-09-05 12:10     ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d79cc64-46d8-42ab-8219-e45e8d19532f@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).