Linux-api Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	 "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:35:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221-hocken-jagdbeute-695072475027@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221125525.GA16773@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/21, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:22:02PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > +       /* Currently unused. */
> > > > > > +       if (info)
> > > > > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, to me this looks like the unnecessary restriction... And why?
> > > >
> > > > Because right now we aren't sure that it's used
> > >
> > > Yes, but...
> > >
> > > > and we aren't sure what use-cases are there.
> > >
> > > the same use-cases as for rt_sigqueueinfo() ?
> >
> > Specifically for pidfd_send_signal() I mean. To me it seems very
> > unlikely that anyone would be opening a pidfd to itself
> 
> Ah, with this, I do agree. And that is why (I think) we can remove
> the "task_pid(current) != pid" check in the "info != NULL" branch.

Ok, so let's try that. :)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09 13:06 [PATCH v2 1/2] signal: add the "int si_code" arg to prepare_kill_siginfo() Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 15:11   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:15   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:43     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 15:49       ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:56         ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 10:23           ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 12:30             ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 12:47               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 12:54               ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 13:15                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 14:26                   ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 16:51                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 17:22                       ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-14 12:36                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-16 12:28                         ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-16 13:06                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-16 14:46                             ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-16 18:12                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20  8:34                                 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20  9:02                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20  9:22                                     ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20 11:00                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20 12:59                                         ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20 16:22                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-21  7:42                                             ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-21 12:55                                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-21 13:35                                                 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-02-09 19:08   ` Tycho Andersen
2024-02-09 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] signal: add the "int si_code" arg to prepare_kill_siginfo() Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 16:13 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 16:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-02-09 16:39   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 19:36     ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 19:53       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 20:01       ` Tycho Andersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221-hocken-jagdbeute-695072475027@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).