From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:45:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZE0teudDjXJFz+1b@manet.1015granger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dafbff6baa201b8af862ee3faf7fe948d2a026ab.camel@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:13:33AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 16:01 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Jan,
> >
> > Following up on the FAN_REPORT_ANY_FID proposal [1], here is a shot at an
> > alternative proposal to seamlessly support more filesystems.
> >
> > While fanotify relaxes the requirements for filesystems to support
> > reporting fid to require only the ->encode_fh() operation, there are
> > currently no new filesystems that meet the relaxed requirements.
> >
> > I will shortly post patches that allow overlayfs to meet the new
> > requirements with default overlay configurations.
> >
> > The overlay and vfs/fanotify patch sets are completely independent.
> > The are both available on my github branch [2] and there is a simple
> > LTP test variant that tests reporting fid from overlayfs [3], which
> > also demonstrates the minor UAPI change of name_to_handle_at(2) for
> > requesting a non-decodeable file handle by userspace.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230417162721.ouzs33oh6mb7vtft@quack3/
> > [2] https://github.com/amir73il/linux/commits/exportfs_encode_fid
> > [3] https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/exportfs_encode_fid
> >
> > Amir Goldstein (4):
> > exportfs: change connectable argument to bit flags
> > exportfs: add explicit flag to request non-decodeable file handles
> > exportfs: allow exporting non-decodeable file handles to userspace
> > fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles
> >
> > Documentation/filesystems/nfs/exporting.rst | 4 +--
> > fs/exportfs/expfs.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---
> > fs/fhandle.c | 20 ++++++++------
> > fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 5 ++--
> > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 4 +--
> > fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 ++---
> > fs/notify/fdinfo.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/exportfs.h | 18 ++++++++++---
> > include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 5 ++++
> > 9 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
>
> This set looks fairly benign to me, so ACK on the general concept.
Me also (modulo previous review comments), so
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
I assume either Amir or Jeff will take these when they are ready.
If I'm wrong, please do let me know and I can take them via the
NFSD tree.
> I am starting to dislike how the AT_* flags are turning into a bunch of
> flags that only have meanings on certain syscalls. I don't see a cleaner
> way to handle it though.
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-29 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 13:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] exportfs: change connectable argument to bit flags Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:16 ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] exportfs: add explicit flag to request non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-26 14:18 ` Chuck Lever
2023-04-27 15:00 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] exportfs: allow exporting non-decodeable file handles to userspace Amir Goldstein
2023-04-25 13:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] fanotify: support reporting non-decodeable file handles Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 11:48 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-27 12:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 14:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:34 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-26 13:47 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Prepare for supporting more filesystems with fanotify Chuck Lever
2023-04-27 4:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 15:13 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 15:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 16:36 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-27 19:11 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-27 19:26 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 11:40 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:15 ` Jeff Layton
2023-04-28 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-28 12:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-04-29 14:45 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2023-04-29 17:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-05-01 18:48 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZE0teudDjXJFz+1b@manet.1015granger.net \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).