Linux-api Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	dvhart@infradead.org, andrealmeid@igalia.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, malteskarupke@web.de,
	steve.shaw@intel.com, marko.makela@mariadb.com,
	andrei.artemev@intel.com
Subject: Re: futex2 numa stuff
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 06:40:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <zhd6njnv63lithg5yetvyniwt34wcltxa5huk4ustp7j7pf2na@6v6qehyb3w3g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230922200120.011184118@infradead.org>

On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

>Hi!
>
>Updated version of patch 15/15 and a few extra patches for testing the
>FUTEX2_NUMA bits. The last patch (17/15) should never be applied for anything
>you care about and exists purely because I'm too lazy to generate actual
>hash-bucket contention.
>
>On my 2 node IVB-EP:
>
> $ echo FUTEX_SQUASH > /debug/sched/features
>
>Effectively reducing each node to 1 bucket.
>
> $ numactl -m0 -N0 ./futex_numa -c10 -t2 -n0 -N0 &
>   numactl -m1 -N1 ./futex_numa -c10 -t2 -n0 -N0
>
> ...
> contenders: 16154935
> contenders: 16202472
>
> $ numactl -m0 -N0 ./futex_numa -c10 -t2 -n0 -N0 &
>   numactl -m1 -N1 ./futex_numa -c10 -t2 -n0 -N1
>
> contenders: 48584991
> contenders: 48680560
>
>(loop counts, higher is better)
>
>Clearly showing how separating the hashes works.
>
>The first one runs 10 contenders on each node but forces the (numa) futex to
>hash to node 0 for both. This ensures all 20 contenders hash to the same
>bucket and *ouch*.
>
>The second one does the same, except now fully separates the nodes. Performance
>is much improved.
>
>Proving the per-node hashing actually works as advertised.

Very nice.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-21 10:45 [PATCH v3 00/15] futex: More futex2 bits peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] futex: Validate futex value against futex size peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] futex: Add sys_futex_wake() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] futex: Add sys_futex_wait() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] futex: Propagate flags into get_futex_key() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] futex: Add flags2 argument to futex_requeue() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] futex: Add sys_futex_requeue() peterz
2023-09-22  9:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-22 11:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-22 13:56       ` Jens Axboe
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] mm: Add vmalloc_huge_node() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] futex: Propagate flags into futex_get_value_locked() peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] futex: Enable FUTEX2_{8,16} peterz
2023-09-21 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] futex,selftests: Extend the futex selftests peterz
2023-09-21 11:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found] ` <20230921105248.048643656@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2023-09-21 15:14   ` [PATCH v3 06/15] futex: FLAGS_STRICT Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-22 20:01 ` futex2 numa stuff Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-22 20:01   ` [PATCH 15/15] futex,selftests: Extend the futex selftests Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-22 20:01   ` [PATCH 16/15] futex,selftests: Extend the futex selftests for NUMA Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-22 20:01   ` [PATCH 17/15] [HACK] futex: Force futex hash collision Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-28 13:40   ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=zhd6njnv63lithg5yetvyniwt34wcltxa5huk4ustp7j7pf2na@6v6qehyb3w3g \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=andrei.artemev@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=malteskarupke@web.de \
    --cc=marko.makela@mariadb.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.shaw@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).