Linux-arch Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
	"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
	"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] s390: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:57:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXHKfd8agPGx+MjvC4cjW5F6DEeVec3Moe-=LLkrT3CXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312170309.2546362-12-linux@roeck-us.net>

Hi Günter,

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:06 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> Add name of functions triggering warning backtraces to the __bug_table
> object section to enable support for suppressing WARNING backtraces.
>
> To limit image size impact, the pointer to the function name is only added
> to the __bug_table section if both CONFIG_KUNIT and CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> are enabled. Otherwise, the __func__ assembly parameter is replaced with a
> (dummy) NULL parameter to avoid an image size increase due to unused
> __func__ entries (this is necessary because __func__ is not a define but a
> virtual variable).
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
> @@ -8,19 +8,30 @@
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
> +# define HAVE_BUG_FUNCTION
> +# define __BUG_FUNC_PTR        "       .long   %0-.\n"
> +# define __BUG_FUNC    __func__
> +#else
> +# define __BUG_FUNC_PTR
> +# define __BUG_FUNC    NULL
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
> +
>  #define __EMIT_BUG(x) do {                                     \
>         asm_inline volatile(                                    \
>                 "0:     mc      0,0\n"                          \
>                 ".section .rodata.str,\"aMS\",@progbits,1\n"    \
>                 "1:     .asciz  \""__FILE__"\"\n"               \
>                 ".previous\n"                                   \
> -               ".section __bug_table,\"awM\",@progbits,%2\n"   \
> +               ".section __bug_table,\"awM\",@progbits,%3\n"   \

This change conflicts with commit 3938490e78f443fb ("s390/bug:
remove entry size from __bug_table section") in linus/master.
I guess it should just be dropped?

>                 "2:     .long   0b-.\n"                         \
>                 "       .long   1b-.\n"                         \
> -               "       .short  %0,%1\n"                        \
> -               "       .org    2b+%2\n"                        \
> +               __BUG_FUNC_PTR                                  \
> +               "       .short  %1,%2\n"                        \
> +               "       .org    2b+%3\n"                        \
>                 ".previous\n"                                   \
> -               : : "i" (__LINE__),                             \
> +               : : "i" (__BUG_FUNC),                           \
> +                   "i" (__LINE__),                             \
>                     "i" (x),                                    \
>                     "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)));            \
>  } while (0)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12 17:02 [PATCH 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 01/14] bug/kunit: Core " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 22:00   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 22:02   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 03/14] kunit: Add test cases for backtrace warning suppression Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 22:02   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-12 17:02 ` [PATCH 04/14] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 22:03   ` Kees Cook
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 07/14] x86: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 08/14] arm64: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 09/14] loongarch: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 10/14] parisc: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-15 11:45   ` Helge Deller
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 11/14] s390: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-14  7:57   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2024-03-14 13:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 12/14] sh: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 13/14] riscv: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-12 17:03 ` [PATCH 14/14] powerpc: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-13  7:39 ` [PATCH 00/14] " Dan Carpenter
2024-03-14  7:19 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-03-14 13:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-03-14 14:37   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-14 15:02     ` Maxime Ripard
2024-03-14 15:29       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-16 16:16     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-18  3:24       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdXHKfd8agPGx+MjvC4cjW5F6DEeVec3Moe-=LLkrT3CXQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arthurgrillo@riseup.net \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).