Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Shivansh Vij <shivanshvij@outlook.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64/mm: Remove PTE_PROT_NONE bit
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 15:46:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240503144604.151095-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503144604.151095-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>

Currently the PTE_PRESENT_INVALID and PTE_PROT_NONE functionality
explicitly occupy 2 bits in the PTE when PTE_VALID/PMD_SECT_VALID is
clear. This has 2 significant consequences:

  - PTE_PROT_NONE consumes a precious SW PTE bit that could be used for
    other things.
  - The swap pte layout must reserve those same 2 bits and ensure they
    are both always zero for a swap pte. It would be nice to reclaim at
    least one of those bits.

But PTE_PRESENT_INVALID, which since the previous patch, applies
uniformly to page/block descriptors at any level when PTE_VALID is
clear, can already give us most of what PTE_PROT_NONE requires: If it is
set, then the pte is still considered present; pte_present() returns
true and all the fields in the pte follow the HW interpretation (e.g. SW
can safely call pte_pfn(), etc). But crucially, the HW treats the pte as
invalid and will fault if it hits.

So let's remove PTE_PROT_NONE entirely and instead represent PROT_NONE
as a present but invalid pte (PTE_VALID=0, PTE_PRESENT_INVALID=1) with
PTE_USER=0 and PTE_UXN=1. This is a unique combination that is not used
anywhere else.

The net result is a clearer, simpler, more generic encoding scheme that
applies uniformly to all levels. Additionally we free up a PTE SW bit
and a swap pte bit (bit 58 in both cases).

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h |  3 +--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h      | 31 +++++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
index cdbf51eef7a6..81f07b44f7b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 #define PTE_DIRTY		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 55)
 #define PTE_SPECIAL		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 56)
 #define PTE_DEVMAP		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
-#define PTE_PROT_NONE		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 58) /* only when !PTE_VALID */
 
 /*
  * PTE_PRESENT_INVALID=1 & PTE_VALID=0 indicates that the pte's fields should be
@@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ static inline bool __pure lpa2_is_enabled(void)
 		__val;							\
 	 })
 
-#define PAGE_NONE		__pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) | PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
+#define PAGE_NONE		__pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) | PTE_PRESENT_INVALID | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
 /* shared+writable pages are clean by default, hence PTE_RDONLY|PTE_WRITE */
 #define PAGE_SHARED		__pgprot(_PAGE_SHARED)
 #define PAGE_SHARED_EXEC	__pgprot(_PAGE_SHARED_EXEC)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 7156c940ac4f..c0f4471423db 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
 /*
  * The following only work if pte_present(). Undefined behaviour otherwise.
  */
-#define pte_present(pte)	(!!(pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)))
+#define pte_present(pte)	(pte_valid(pte) || pte_present_invalid(pte))
 #define pte_young(pte)		(!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_AF))
 #define pte_special(pte)	(!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_SPECIAL))
 #define pte_write(pte)		(!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_WRITE))
@@ -478,7 +478,16 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
  */
 static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
 {
-	return (pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)) == PTE_PROT_NONE;
+	/*
+	 * pte_present_invalid() tells us that the pte is invalid from HW
+	 * perspective but present from SW perspective, so the fields are to be
+	 * interpretted as per the HW layout. The second 2 checks are the unique
+	 * encoding that we use for PROT_NONE. It is insufficient to only use
+	 * the first check because we share the same encoding scheme with pmds
+	 * which support pmd_mkinvalid(), so can be present-invalid without
+	 * being PROT_NONE.
+	 */
+	return pte_present_invalid(pte) && !pte_user(pte) && !pte_user_exec(pte);
 }
 
 static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
@@ -487,12 +496,7 @@ static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
 }
 #endif
 
-#define pmd_present_invalid(pmd)	pte_present_invalid(pmd_pte(pmd))
-
-static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
-{
-	return pte_present(pmd_pte(pmd)) || pmd_present_invalid(pmd);
-}
+#define pmd_present(pmd)	pte_present(pmd_pte(pmd))
 
 /*
  * THP definitions.
@@ -1029,8 +1033,8 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
 	 * in MAIR_EL1. The mask below has to include PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK.
 	 */
 	const pteval_t mask = PTE_USER | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_RDONLY |
-			      PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_VALID | PTE_WRITE | PTE_GP |
-			      PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
+			      PTE_PRESENT_INVALID | PTE_VALID | PTE_WRITE |
+			      PTE_GP | PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
 	/* preserve the hardware dirty information */
 	if (pte_hw_dirty(pte))
 		pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
@@ -1078,17 +1082,17 @@ static inline int pgd_devmap(pgd_t pgd)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
 static inline bool pte_user_accessible_page(pte_t pte)
 {
-	return pte_present(pte) && (pte_user(pte) || pte_user_exec(pte));
+	return pte_valid(pte) && (pte_user(pte) || pte_user_exec(pte));
 }
 
 static inline bool pmd_user_accessible_page(pmd_t pmd)
 {
-	return pmd_leaf(pmd) && !pmd_present_invalid(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
+	return pmd_valid(pmd) && !pmd_table(pmd) && (pmd_user(pmd) || pmd_user_exec(pmd));
 }
 
 static inline bool pud_user_accessible_page(pud_t pud)
 {
-	return pud_leaf(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
+	return pud_valid(pud) && !pud_table(pud) && (pud_user(pud) || pud_user_exec(pud));
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -1252,7 +1256,6 @@ static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  *	bits 2:		remember PG_anon_exclusive
  *	bits 3-7:	swap type
  *	bits 8-57:	swap offset
- *	bit  58:	PTE_PROT_NONE (must be zero)
  *	bit  59:	PTE_PRESENT_INVALID (must be zero)
  */
 #define __SWP_TYPE_SHIFT	3
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 14:45 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64/mm: Enable userfaultfd write-protect Ryan Roberts
2024-05-03 14:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64/mm: generalize PMD_PRESENT_INVALID for all levels Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07 11:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 12:34     ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07 14:08       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-07 15:06         ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-08  9:43   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 14:46 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2024-05-07 11:40   ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64/mm: Remove PTE_PROT_NONE bit David Hildenbrand
2024-05-08  9:50   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-03 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64/mm: Move PTE_PRESENT_INVALID to overlay PTE_NG Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07 11:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-03 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64/mm: Add uffd write-protect support Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07 11:45   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 11:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64/mm: Enable userfaultfd write-protect Will Deacon
2024-05-07 11:17   ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-07 11:45     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-08 10:00   ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-05-08 10:14     ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240503144604.151095-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shivanshvij@outlook.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).