From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.8 18/52] KVM: selftests: Add test for uaccesses to non-existent vgic-v2 CPUIF
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 19:06:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240507230800.392128-18-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507230800.392128-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
[ Upstream commit 160933e330f4c5a13931d725a4d952a4b9aefa71 ]
Assert that accesses to a non-existent vgic-v2 CPU interface
consistently fail across the various KVM device attr ioctls. This also
serves as a regression test for a bug wherein KVM hits a NULL
dereference when the CPUID specified in the ioctl is invalid.
Note that there is no need to print the observed errno, as TEST_ASSERT()
will take care of it.
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424173959.3776798-3-oliver.upton@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
index eef816b80993f..ca917c71ff602 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_init.c
@@ -84,6 +84,18 @@ static struct vm_gic vm_gic_create_with_vcpus(uint32_t gic_dev_type,
return v;
}
+static struct vm_gic vm_gic_create_barebones(uint32_t gic_dev_type)
+{
+ struct vm_gic v;
+
+ v.gic_dev_type = gic_dev_type;
+ v.vm = vm_create_barebones();
+ v.gic_fd = kvm_create_device(v.vm, gic_dev_type);
+
+ return v;
+}
+
+
static void vm_gic_destroy(struct vm_gic *v)
{
close(v->gic_fd);
@@ -357,6 +369,40 @@ static void test_vcpus_then_vgic(uint32_t gic_dev_type)
vm_gic_destroy(&v);
}
+#define KVM_VGIC_V2_ATTR(offset, cpu) \
+ (FIELD_PREP(KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_OFFSET_MASK, offset) | \
+ FIELD_PREP(KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPUID_MASK, cpu))
+
+#define GIC_CPU_CTRL 0x00
+
+static void test_v2_uaccess_cpuif_no_vcpus(void)
+{
+ struct vm_gic v;
+ u64 val = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ v = vm_gic_create_barebones(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
+ subtest_dist_rdist(&v);
+
+ ret = __kvm_has_device_attr(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS,
+ KVM_VGIC_V2_ATTR(GIC_CPU_CTRL, 0));
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
+ "accessed non-existent CPU interface, want errno: %i",
+ EINVAL);
+ ret = __kvm_device_attr_get(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS,
+ KVM_VGIC_V2_ATTR(GIC_CPU_CTRL, 0), &val);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
+ "accessed non-existent CPU interface, want errno: %i",
+ EINVAL);
+ ret = __kvm_device_attr_set(v.gic_fd, KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_REGS,
+ KVM_VGIC_V2_ATTR(GIC_CPU_CTRL, 0), &val);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
+ "accessed non-existent CPU interface, want errno: %i",
+ EINVAL);
+
+ vm_gic_destroy(&v);
+}
+
static void test_v3_new_redist_regions(void)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpus[NR_VCPUS];
@@ -675,6 +721,9 @@ void run_tests(uint32_t gic_dev_type)
test_vcpus_then_vgic(gic_dev_type);
test_vgic_then_vcpus(gic_dev_type);
+ if (VGIC_DEV_IS_V2(gic_dev_type))
+ test_v2_uaccess_cpuif_no_vcpus();
+
if (VGIC_DEV_IS_V3(gic_dev_type)) {
test_v3_new_redist_regions();
test_v3_typer_accesses();
--
2.43.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240507230800.392128-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2024-05-07 23:06 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2024-05-08 6:25 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.8 18/52] KVM: selftests: Add test for uaccesses to non-existent vgic-v2 CPUIF Oliver Upton
2024-05-08 17:55 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240507230800.392128-18-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).