Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, kristo@kernel.org,
	vigneshr@ti.com, nm@ti.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	marten.lindahl@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: dt-bindings: Unify compatible
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:10:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjtrmqtB0GuLZRt5@finisterre.sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507211112.GA1053164-robh@kernel.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:11:12PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 05:51:54PM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> > TPS62870/1/2/3 devices have different output currents (6A/9A/12A/15A) of
> > the TPS6287x family. The I2C addresses are the same between them. There
> > is no need for different compatibles for each for these devices so drop
> > them and add a unified "ti,tps6287x" compatible.

> And s/w will never need to know what the max output current is?

Yes, this seems destructive of information for no gain - if anything it
makes things harder to use since you can't just use the part number and
instead have to know about the wildcard.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 12:21 [PATCH 0/5] arm64: ti: Add TPS6287 nodes Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-07 12:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: dt-bindings: Unify compatible Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-07 21:11   ` Rob Herring
2024-05-08  2:32     ` Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-08 12:10     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2024-05-07 12:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] drivers: regulator: tps6287x: " Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-07 12:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: boot: dts: ti: k3-am68-sk-base-board: Add LP8733 and TPS6287 nodes Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-08  4:55   ` Kumar, Udit
2024-05-08  6:48     ` Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-07 12:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: boot: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Add TPS62873 node Neha Malcom Francis
2024-05-07 12:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: boot: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: " Neha Malcom Francis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjtrmqtB0GuLZRt5@finisterre.sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristo@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marten.lindahl@axis.com \
    --cc=n-francis@ti.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).