From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com, Amjad Gabbar <amjadgabbar11@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Sycall Rules vs Watch Rules
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:12:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8295448.T7Z3S40VBb@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcJf=TQ6R4zjNPX+TQyDBxtFz+QWQWDqT3t0PEXvzp9CvJS_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 5:20:54 PM EDT Amjad Gabbar wrote:
> Based on this and some experiments I have been performing, I would suggest
> changing how a lot of the FileSystem rules are written and illustrated.
> Ex -
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/master/rules/30-pci-dss
> -v31.rules#L34-L35
>
> The rule in the repository is
> -a always,exit -F path=/etc/sudoers -F perm=wa -F
> key=10.2.2-priv-config-changes
>
> My suggestion is to instead change the rule based on the permissions
> defined. The above rule would change to the following based on the kernel
> being used.
> -a always,exit -S <list of syscalls in audit_write.h and audit_read.h
> +open,openat> -F path=/etc/sudoers -F perm=wa -F
> key=10.2.2-priv-config-changes
That should be exactly what the kernel does with the perm fields. The perm
fields select the right system calls that should be reported on.
> This is higher performance because we are limiting the syscalls instead of
> making use of -S all which has more paths of evaluation for each and every
> syscall.
>
> Same thing for watches. Watches are inherently -S all rules which are very
> performance intensive.
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/blob/1482cec74f2d9472f81dd4f
> 0533484bd0c26decd/lib/libaudit.c#L805
There should be no difference in performance between watches and syscall
based file auditing.
> Ideally we should limit the syscalls based on the permissions being used.
>
> I have implemented the same in my environment rules and have noticed a
> massive performance difference with no difference in the events being
> logged since we anyways filter eventually based on the permissions.
>
> Let me know what you all think.
I'm looking into this more. I see a 1 line change that I am testing.
-Steve
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 2:58 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 2023-09-06 10:56, Amjad Gabbar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have done some analysis and digging into how both the watch rules and
> > > syscall rules are translated.
> > >
> > > From my understanding, in terms of logging, both the below rules are
> > > similar. There is no difference in either of the rules.
> > >
> > > 1. -w /etc -p wa -k ETC_WATCH
> >
> > They are similar in this case.
> > -w behaves differently depending on the existance of the watched entity
> > and the presence of a trailing "/". This is why the form above is
> > deprecated.
> >
> > > 2. -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S <all syscalls part of the write and
> > > attr
> > > classes> -F dir=/etc -F perm=wa -k ETC_WATCH
> > >
> > > The write and attr classes consist of syscalls in
> > > “include/asm-generic/audit_*.h“.
> > >
> > > The perm flag is needed in the second case for including open/openat
> > >
> > > syscalls which are not a part of the write and attr syscall list.
> > >
> > > I'd like to verify if what I mentioned earlier is accurate, and I have
> > > an
> > > additional point but depends on whether this is accurate.
> > >
> > > Ali
> >
> > - RGB
> >
> > --
> > Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
> > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
> > Upstream IRC: SunRaycer
> > Voice: +1.613.860 2354 SMS: +1.613.518.6570
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 15:56 Sycall Rules vs Watch Rules Amjad Gabbar
2023-09-06 19:58 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-09-12 21:20 ` Amjad Gabbar
2023-09-15 6:00 ` Amjad Gabbar
2023-09-19 23:12 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2023-09-20 0:26 ` Amjad Gabbar
2023-09-20 18:45 ` Steve Grubb
2023-09-20 23:33 ` Steve Grubb
2023-09-21 20:02 ` Amjad Gabbar
2023-09-28 15:53 ` Steve Grubb
2023-09-28 16:30 ` Steve Grubb
2023-09-29 16:39 ` Amjad Gabbar
2023-10-08 4:46 ` Amjad Gabbar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8295448.T7Z3S40VBb@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=amjadgabbar11@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).