Linux-CIFS Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>
To: Bharath SM <bharathsm.hsk@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, smfrench@gmail.com, pc@manguebit.org,
	 bharathsm@microsoft.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	henrique.carvalho@suse.com,  ematsumiya@suse.de,
	Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] cifs: abort open_cached_dir if we don't request leases
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:36:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANT5p=rJ28LCOT1qcn9Xtcutq4mJB9t+jX9e79fDOXg0cHh0Ow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGypqWzrOmR6rUimbBJa9qJ-=+KJFzccMjere9dX=KwWeDFe+A@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 8:56 PM Bharath SM <bharathsm.hsk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 11:40 PM <nspmangalore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
> >
> > It is possible that SMB2_open_init may not set lease context based
> > on the requested oplock level. This can happen when leases have been
> > temporarily or permanently disabled. When this happens, we will have
> > open_cached_dir making an open without lease context and the response
> > will anyway be rejected by open_cached_dir (thereby forcing a close to
> > discard this open). That's unnecessary two round-trips to the server.
> >
> > This change adds a check before making the open request to the server
> > to make sure that SMB2_open_init did add the expected lease context
> > to the open in open_cached_dir.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c b/fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c
> > index 04bb95091f498..e9917e5204b00 100644
> > --- a/fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c
> > @@ -286,6 +286,13 @@ int open_cached_dir(unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
> >                             &rqst[0], &oplock, &oparms, utf16_path);
> >         if (rc)
> >                 goto oshr_free;
> > +
> > +       if (oplock != SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_II) {
> > +               rc = -EINVAL;
> > +               cifs_dbg(FYI, "unexpected oplock level %d for cached directory\n", oplock);
> Should we reword the log from "'unexpected' oplock level for cached
> directory" to something like
> lease not available for cached dir.? Considering  the client itself
> might be disabling oplock temporarily.
> "unexpected" might look misleading.

Hi Bharath,
Thanks for the review. Will make the change.

>
> > +               goto oshr_free;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         smb2_set_next_command(tcon, &rqst[0]);
> >
> >         memset(&qi_iov, 0, sizeof(qi_iov));
>
> Other than the above minor comment, Changes look good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>



-- 
Regards,
Shyam

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  6:39 [PATCH v2 1/7] cifs: change_conf needs to be called for session setup nspmangalore
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cifs: abort open_cached_dir if we don't request leases nspmangalore
2026-04-21 15:26   ` Bharath SM
2026-04-24  4:06     ` Shyam Prasad N [this message]
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] cifs: invalidate cfid on unlink/rename/rmdir nspmangalore
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] cifs: define variable sized buffer for querydir responses nspmangalore
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] cifs: optimize readdir for small directories nspmangalore
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] cifs: optimize readdir for larger directories nspmangalore
2026-04-21  6:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] cifs: reorganize cached dir helpers nspmangalore
2026-04-21 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] cifs: change_conf needs to be called for session setup Bharath SM
2026-04-24  4:07   ` Shyam Prasad N

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANT5p=rJ28LCOT1qcn9Xtcutq4mJB9t+jX9e79fDOXg0cHh0Ow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nspmangalore@gmail.com \
    --cc=bharathsm.hsk@gmail.com \
    --cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ematsumiya@suse.de \
    --cc=henrique.carvalho@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).