From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:20:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77272c635a928f3582ce53766b20c747.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y7i7vwl7h2xop2ifh72vj5brtq7vd7tf72tst7k7r74plguhgn@cqs5fzplfk5i>
Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2024-04-19 13:00:19)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K�nig wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Uwe Kleine-K�nig (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > > > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() also
> > > > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > > > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in that
> > > > case (i.e. nothing).
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive_get()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K�nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Applied to clk-fixes
> >
> > I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
> > great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
> > the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
> > this function is missing.
Yes.
>
> Gentle ping. I'd like to get the patches I intend to send to Linus for
> v6.10-rc1 into shape. To have these unmodified in my for-next branch for
> some time it would be great to know your plans for the clk-fixes branch.
> Alternatively: Can I expect the commit not to be changed any more and
> pull it into my pwm tree?
>
clk-fixes is sent to Linus during the rc cycle. I'm sending a PR today.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com>
2024-03-27 7:33 ` [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() Uwe Kleine-König
2024-03-28 22:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-12 20:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-19 20:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-04-19 22:20 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77272c635a928f3582ce53766b20c747.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).