From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: David Dai <davidai@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>,
Gupta Pankaj <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:13:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240127004321.1902477-3-davidai@google.com>
Hi David,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on robh/for-next linus/master rafael-pm/acpi-bus v6.8-rc2 next-20240130]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Dai/dt-bindings-cpufreq-add-virtual-cpufreq-device/20240127-084645
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240127004321.1902477-3-davidai%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver
config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20240130 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240131/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: topology_set_scale_freq_source
>>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:115 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:115)
>>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_cpufreq_cpu_init) in archive vmlinux.a
--
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: topology_clear_scale_freq_source
>>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:128 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:128)
>>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_cpufreq_cpu_exit) in archive vmlinux.a
--
>> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: arch_freq_scale
>>> referenced by virtual-cpufreq.c:38 (drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.c:38)
>>> drivers/cpufreq/virtual-cpufreq.o:(virt_scale_freq_tick) in archive vmlinux.a
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-27 0:43 [PATCH v5 0/2] Improve VM CPUfreq and task placement behavior David Dai
2024-01-27 0:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add virtual cpufreq device David Dai
2024-01-31 17:06 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31 18:23 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-02-02 15:53 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-04 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-03-11 11:40 ` Quentin Perret
2024-02-05 8:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-02-05 16:39 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-15 11:26 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-02 20:17 ` David Dai
2024-05-07 10:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-17 20:59 ` David Dai
2024-01-27 0:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver David Dai
2024-01-31 1:13 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401310804.bWt7Vf6o-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davidai@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@google.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).