Linux-Doc Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: corbet@lwn.net
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: coding-style: don't encourage WARN*()
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:08:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240414170850.148122-1-elder@linaro.org> (raw)

Several times recently Greg KH has admonished that variants of WARN()
should not be used, because when the panic_on_warn kernel option is set,
their use can lead to a panic. His reasoning was that the majority of
Linux instances (including Android and cloud systems) run with this option
enabled. And therefore a condition leading to a warning will frequently
cause an undesirable panic.

The "coding-style.rst" document says not to worry about this kernel
option.  Update it to provide a more nuanced explanation.

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
index 9c7cf73473943..bce43b01721cb 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
@@ -1235,17 +1235,18 @@ example. Again: WARN*() must not be used for a condition that is expected
 to trigger easily, for example, by user space actions. pr_warn_once() is a
 possible alternative, if you need to notify the user of a problem.
 
-Do not worry about panic_on_warn users
-**************************************
+The panic_on_warn kernel option
+********************************
 
-A few more words about panic_on_warn: Remember that ``panic_on_warn`` is an
-available kernel option, and that many users set this option. This is why
-there is a "Do not WARN lightly" writeup, above. However, the existence of
-panic_on_warn users is not a valid reason to avoid the judicious use
-WARN*(). That is because, whoever enables panic_on_warn has explicitly
-asked the kernel to crash if a WARN*() fires, and such users must be
-prepared to deal with the consequences of a system that is somewhat more
-likely to crash.
+Note that ``panic_on_warn`` is an available kernel option. If it is enabled,
+a WARN*() call whose condition holds leads to a kernel panic.  Many users
+(including Android and many cloud providers) set this option, and this is
+why there is a "Do not WARN lightly" writeup, above.
+
+The existence of this option is not a valid reason to avoid the judicious
+use of warnings. There are other options: ``dev_warn*()`` and ``pr_warn*()``
+issue warnings but do **not** cause the kernel to crash. Use these if you
+want to prevent such panics.
 
 Use BUILD_BUG_ON() for compile-time assertions
 **********************************************
-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-14 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-14 17:08 Alex Elder [this message]
2024-04-14 19:48 ` [PATCH] Documentation: coding-style: don't encourage WARN*() Laurent Pinchart
2024-04-14 20:06   ` Alex Elder
2024-04-15  5:21   ` Greg KH
2024-04-15  8:25     ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-04-15  8:33       ` Greg KH
2024-04-15  8:42         ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-04-15  5:22 ` Greg KH
2024-04-15  8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-15  8:35   ` Greg KH
2024-04-15  8:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-15 16:26     ` Kees Cook
2024-04-18 15:57       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-18 16:14 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-18 17:12   ` Kees Cook
2024-04-18 22:33   ` John Hubbard
2024-04-19  7:16 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240414170850.148122-1-elder@linaro.org \
    --to=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).