From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
To: netfs@lists.linux.dev, dhowells@redhat.com, jlayton@kernel.org
Cc: libaokun@huaweicloud.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:45:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240515084601.3240503-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515084601.3240503-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
command:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962
CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
Call Trace:
kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
Allocated by task 626:
__kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
Freed by task 626:
kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
[...]
==================================================================
Following is the process that triggers the issue:
mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
------------------------------------------------------------
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
process_open_req(REQ_A)
------ restore ------
cachefiles_ondemand_restore
xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
cachefiles_daemon_read
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
cachefiles_ondemand_copen
xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
complete(&REQ_A->done)
kfree(REQ_A)
cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
fd = get_unused_fd_flags
file = anon_inode_getfile
fd_install(fd, file)
load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
load->fd = fd;
// load UAF !!!
This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still
alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then
released when the waiting and reading is over.
Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to
avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.
Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover inflight ondemand read requests")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/internal.h | 1 +
fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
index d33169f0018b..7745b8abc3aa 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline bool cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
struct cachefiles_req {
struct cachefiles_object *object;
struct completion done;
+ refcount_t ref;
int error;
struct cachefiles_msg msg;
};
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
index fd49728d8bae..56d12fe4bf73 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
#include <linux/uio.h>
#include "internal.h"
+static inline void cachefiles_req_put(struct cachefiles_req *req)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
+ kfree(req);
+}
+
static int cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release(struct inode *inode,
struct file *file)
{
@@ -299,7 +305,6 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
{
struct cachefiles_req *req;
struct cachefiles_msg *msg;
- unsigned long id = 0;
size_t n;
int ret = 0;
XA_STATE(xas, &cache->reqs, cache->req_id_next);
@@ -330,41 +335,39 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
xas_clear_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
cache->req_id_next = xas.xa_index + 1;
+ refcount_inc(&req->ref);
xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
- id = xas.xa_index;
-
if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN) {
ret = cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(req);
if (ret) {
cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(req->object);
- goto error;
+ goto out;
}
}
- msg->msg_id = id;
+ msg->msg_id = xas.xa_index;
msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id;
if (copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n) != 0) {
ret = -EFAULT;
if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN)
close_fd(((struct cachefiles_open *)msg->data)->fd);
- goto error;
}
-
- /* CLOSE request has no reply */
- if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) {
- xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id);
- complete(&req->done);
+out:
+ /* Remove error request and CLOSE request has no reply */
+ if (ret || msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) {
+ xas_reset(&xas);
+ xas_lock(&xas);
+ if (xas_load(&xas) == req) {
+ req->error = ret;
+ complete(&req->done);
+ xas_store(&xas, NULL);
+ }
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
}
-
- return n;
-
-error:
- xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id);
- req->error = ret;
- complete(&req->done);
- return ret;
+ cachefiles_req_put(req);
+ return ret ? ret : n;
}
typedef int (*init_req_fn)(struct cachefiles_req *req, void *private);
@@ -394,6 +397,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object,
goto out;
}
+ refcount_set(&req->ref, 1);
req->object = object;
init_completion(&req->done);
req->msg.opcode = opcode;
@@ -455,7 +459,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct cachefiles_object *object,
wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq);
wait_for_completion(&req->done);
ret = req->error;
- kfree(req);
+ cachefiles_req_put(req);
return ret;
out:
/* Reset the object to close state in error handling path.
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-15 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-15 8:45 [PATCH v2 00/12] cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests libaokun
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] cachefiles: remove request from xarry during flush requests libaokun
2024-05-20 2:20 ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-20 4:11 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 7:09 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] cachefiles: remove err_put_fd tag in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() libaokun
2024-05-20 2:23 ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-20 4:15 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 8:45 ` libaokun [this message]
2024-05-20 7:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 8:38 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 8:45 ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-20 9:10 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 9:19 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 12:22 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 8:06 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 9:10 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read() libaokun
2024-05-20 7:36 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 8:56 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] cachefiles: add output string to cachefiles_obj_[get|put]_ondemand_fd libaokun
2024-05-20 7:40 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 9:02 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] cachefiles: add consistency check for copen/cread libaokun
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] cachefiles: add spin_lock for cachefiles_ondemand_info libaokun
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] cachefiles: never get a new anonymous fd if ondemand_id is valid libaokun
2024-05-20 8:43 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 9:07 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 9:24 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 11:14 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-20 11:24 ` Gao Xiang
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] cachefiles: defer exposing anon_fd until after copy_to_user() succeeds libaokun
2024-05-20 9:39 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-05-20 11:36 ` Baokun Li
2024-05-15 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] cachefiles: Set object to close if ondemand_id < 0 in copen libaokun
2024-05-15 8:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] cachefiles: flush all requests after setting CACHEFILES_DEAD libaokun
2024-05-15 8:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] cachefiles: make on-demand read killable libaokun
2024-05-19 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] cachefiles: some bugfixes and cleanups for ondemand requests Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240515084601.3240503-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--to=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).