Linux-Fsdevel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	willy@infradead.org, dchinner@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	hch@lst.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com, nilay@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, mcgrof@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	jbongio@google.com, okiselev@amazon.com,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/7] filemap: Change mapping_set_folio_min_order() -> mapping_set_folio_orders()
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:39:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240422143923.3927601-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422143923.3927601-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Borrowed from:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20240213093713.1753368-2-kernel@pankajraghav.com/
(credit given in due course)

We will need to be able to only use a single folio order for buffered
atomic writes, so allow the mapping folio order min and max be set.

We still have the restriction of not being able to support order-1
folios - it will be required to lift this limit at some stage.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c     | 10 ++++++----
 include/linux/pagemap.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 mm/filemap.c            |  8 +++++++-
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index 8fb5cf0f5a09..6186887bd6ff 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -89,8 +89,9 @@ xfs_inode_alloc(
 	/* VFS doesn't initialise i_mode or i_state! */
 	VFS_I(ip)->i_mode = 0;
 	VFS_I(ip)->i_state = 0;
-	mapping_set_folio_min_order(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
-				    M_IGEO(mp)->min_folio_order);
+	mapping_set_folio_orders(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+				    M_IGEO(mp)->min_folio_order,
+				    MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
 
 	XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active);
 	ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0);
@@ -325,8 +326,9 @@ xfs_reinit_inode(
 	inode->i_rdev = dev;
 	inode->i_uid = uid;
 	inode->i_gid = gid;
-	mapping_set_folio_min_order(inode->i_mapping,
-				    M_IGEO(mp)->min_folio_order);
+	mapping_set_folio_orders(inode->i_mapping,
+				    M_IGEO(mp)->min_folio_order,
+				    MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
 	return error;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index fc8eb9c94e9c..c22455fa28a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -363,9 +363,10 @@ static inline void mapping_set_gfp_mask(struct address_space *m, gfp_t mask)
 #endif
 
 /*
- * mapping_set_folio_min_order() - Set the minimum folio order
+ * mapping_set_folio_orders() - Set the minimum and max folio order
  * @mapping: The address_space.
  * @min: Minimum folio order (between 0-MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER inclusive).
+ * @max: Maximum folio order (between 0-MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER inclusive).
  *
  * The filesystem should call this function in its inode constructor to
  * indicate which base size of folio the VFS can use to cache the contents
@@ -376,15 +377,20 @@ static inline void mapping_set_gfp_mask(struct address_space *m, gfp_t mask)
  * Context: This should not be called while the inode is active as it
  * is non-atomic.
  */
-static inline void mapping_set_folio_min_order(struct address_space *mapping,
-					       unsigned int min)
+
+static inline void mapping_set_folio_orders(struct address_space *mapping,
+					    unsigned int min, unsigned int max)
 {
-	if (min > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
-		min = MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER;
+	if (min == 1)
+		min = 2;
+	if (max < min)
+		max = min;
+	if (max > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
+		max = MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER;
 
 	mapping->flags = (mapping->flags & ~AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MASK) |
 			 (min << AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN) |
-			 (MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER << AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX);
+			 (max << AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MAX);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -400,7 +406,7 @@ static inline void mapping_set_folio_min_order(struct address_space *mapping,
  */
 static inline void mapping_set_large_folios(struct address_space *mapping)
 {
-	mapping_set_folio_min_order(mapping, 0);
+	mapping_set_folio_orders(mapping, 0, MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int mapping_max_folio_order(struct address_space *mapping)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index d81530b0aac0..d5effe50ddcb 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1898,9 +1898,15 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
 no_page:
 	if (!folio && (fgp_flags & FGP_CREAT)) {
 		unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
-		unsigned int order = max(min_order, FGF_GET_ORDER(fgp_flags));
+		unsigned int max_order = mapping_max_folio_order(mapping);
+		unsigned int order = FGF_GET_ORDER(fgp_flags);
 		int err;
 
+		if (order > max_order)
+			order = max_order;
+		else if (order < min_order)
+			order = max_order;
+
 		index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
 
 		if ((fgp_flags & FGP_WRITE) && mapping_can_writeback(mapping))
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22 14:39 [PATCH RFC 0/7] buffered block atomic writes John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] fs: Rename STATX{_ATTR}_WRITE_ATOMIC -> STATX{_ATTR}_WRITE_ATOMIC_DIO John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-04-25 14:47   ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] filemap: Change mapping_set_folio_min_order() -> mapping_set_folio_orders() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-04-26  8:02     ` John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] mm: Add PG_atomic John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] fs: Add initial buffered atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] fs: iomap: buffered atomic write support John Garry
2024-04-22 15:03   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-22 16:02     ` John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] fs: xfs: buffered atomic writes statx support John Garry
2024-04-22 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] fs: xfs: Enable buffered atomic writes John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240422143923.3927601-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbongio@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=okiselev@amazon.com \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).