Linux-GPIO Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@gmail.com>,
	 Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other
	areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be)?b"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mockup: allocate lines with main struct
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:00:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKxU2N8ZZp5fcCWfMaqZ9VKwNQ3a06fsQPXpBQa-d1N07zPGng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202603201104.8D7B8A1@keescook>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 11:10 AM Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 05:05:58PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > Remove no longer needed kcalloc to simplify allocation.
> >
> > Added __counted_by along with a counting variable to get extra runtime
> > analysis.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > index a7d69f3835c1..a907ce28cbbb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mockup.c
> > @@ -52,10 +52,11 @@ struct gpio_mockup_line_status {
> >
> >  struct gpio_mockup_chip {
> >       struct gpio_chip gc;
> > -     struct gpio_mockup_line_status *lines;
> >       struct irq_domain *irq_sim_domain;
> >       struct dentry *dbg_dir;
> >       struct mutex lock;
> > +     int nr_lines;
> > +     struct gpio_mockup_line_status lines[] __counted_by(nr_lines);
> >  };
>
> In the cases where a new counter variable is being added to the struct,
> I think it might be better to have those be unsigned.
>
> >
> >  struct gpio_mockup_dbgfs_private {
> > @@ -436,15 +437,18 @@ static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (rv)
> >               name = dev_name(dev);
> >
> > -     chip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     chip = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(chip, lines, ngpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!chip)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -     mutex_init(&chip->lock);
> > +     chip->nr_lines = ngpio;
>
> Besides the new variable being meaningless for negative values, there's
> a strong hint about its type even from the counter used to perform the
> calculation (u16):
>
> static int gpio_mockup_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
>         ...
>         u16 ngpio;
>         ...
>         rv = device_property_read_u16(dev, "nr-gpios", &ngpio);
>         ...
>         gc->ngpio = ngpio;
>         ...
>         chip->lines = devm_kcalloc(dev, gc->ngpio,
>                                    sizeof(*chip->lines), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> But this begs the question: why add nr_lines when ngpio is already part
> of the struct:
Maintainers for some inexplicable reason want an extra variable for
__counted_by works.
>
> struct gpio_chip {
>         ...
>         u16                     ngpio;
>
>
> ?
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-20 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-19  0:05 [PATCH] gpio: mockup: allocate lines with main struct Rosen Penev
2026-03-20 13:28 ` Linus Walleij
2026-03-20 18:10 ` Kees Cook
2026-03-20 23:00   ` Rosen Penev [this message]
2026-03-23 10:00     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-23 16:43       ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-24  9:16         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-24 15:51           ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-24 15:54             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-24 15:56               ` Rosen Penev
2026-03-24 17:16                 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-24 18:25                   ` Rosen Penev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKxU2N8ZZp5fcCWfMaqZ9VKwNQ3a06fsQPXpBQa-d1N07zPGng@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=bamv2005@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).