From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
TJ Adams <tadamsjr@google.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:28:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZejD6mYBhYFQ5Xq8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZehLfEjfOTs2wGZe@ryzen>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:22:21PM -0800, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> > Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
> > because the ata_port location is different for libsas.
> >
> > Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
> > - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_enable
> > - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_supported
> >
> > The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
> > helper functions.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/scsi/sas_ata.h | 6 +++
> > 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > index 12e2653846e3..04b0bd9a4e01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > @@ -964,3 +964,97 @@ int sas_execute_ata_cmd(struct domain_device *device, u8 *fis, int force_phy_id)
> > force_phy_id, &tmf_task);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_execute_ata_cmd);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_supported_show(struct device *device,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > + bool supported;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Like Hannes commented, I don't believe this is needed.
>
The intention for the check is to serve as a fail-safe in case 'is_visible()'
callback gets incorrectly modified and stops hiding the sysfs attributes
for non-SATA devices.
Just want to clarify should I remove the WARN_ON_ONCE and keep the fail-safe
check or should I get rid of the check completely and trust 'is_visible()'
to always hide the sysfs attributes for non-SATA devices?
>
> > +
> > + rc = ata_ncq_prio_supported(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &supported);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", supported);
> > +}
> > +
>
> While this is a bit different depending on file, the most common way is to
> have no blank link before the DEVICE_ATTR().
>
In "[PATCH 1/3] ata: libata-sata: Factor out NCQ Priority configuration helpers"
Damien asked to keep the blank link before the DEVICE_ATTR() in libata-sata.c.
Non-prio sysfs attributes in libata-sata.c don't have blank lines
before DEVICE_ATTR() so I'm more inclined to remove the lines.
I'm fine with either of ways, just want to get a consensus and make it
consistent for both libata-sata.c and sas_ata.c.
>
> > +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_supported, S_IRUGO, sas_ncq_prio_supported_show, NULL);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_show(struct device *device,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > + bool enabled;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + rc = ata_ncq_prio_enabled(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &enabled);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", enabled);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_store(struct device *device,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > + bool enable;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + rc = kstrtobool(buf, &enable);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + rc = ata_ncq_prio_enable(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, enable);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> > + sas_ncq_prio_enable_show, sas_ncq_prio_enable_store);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *sas_ata_sdev_attrs[] = {
> > + &dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported.attr,
> > + &dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable.attr,
> > + NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static umode_t sas_ata_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > + struct attribute *attr, int i)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> > + struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > +
> > + if (!dev_is_sata(ddev))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return attr->mode;
> > +}
> > +
> > +const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> > + .attrs = sas_ata_sdev_attrs,
> > + .is_visible = sas_ata_attr_is_visible,
> > +};
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_ata_sdev_attr_group);
> > diff --git a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > index 2f8c719840a6..92e27e7bf088 100644
> > --- a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > +++ b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ int smp_ata_check_ready_type(struct ata_link *link);
> > int sas_discover_sata(struct domain_device *dev);
> > int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *phy,
> > struct domain_device *child, int phy_id);
> > +
> > +extern const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group;
> > +
> > #else
> >
> > static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> > @@ -123,6 +126,9 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> > sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > +
> > +#define sas_ata_sdev_attr_group ((struct attribute_group) {})
> > +
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif /* _SAS_ATA_H_ */
> > --
> > 2.44.0.278.ge034bb2e1d-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 1:22 [PATCH v7 0/7] NCQ Priority sysfs sttributes for libsas Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] ata: libata-sata: Factor out NCQ Priority configuration helpers Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 19:28 ` Igor Pylypiv [this message]
2024-03-07 9:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 21:41 ` Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] scsi: pm80xx: Add libsas SATA sysfs attributes group Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] scsi: mvsas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 21:13 ` Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-07 9:52 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 20:35 ` Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] scsi: hisi_sas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 20:56 ` Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-07 8:55 ` John Garry
2024-03-07 9:59 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-07 11:17 ` John Garry
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] scsi: aic94xx: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 21:17 ` Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 1:22 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] scsi: isci: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06 10:55 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] NCQ Priority sysfs sttributes for libsas Niklas Cassel
2024-03-06 21:33 ` Igor Pylypiv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZejD6mYBhYFQ5Xq8@google.com \
--to=ipylypiv@google.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tadamsjr@google.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).