Linux-Integrity Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, miklos@szeredi.hu,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ima: Reset EVM status upon detecting changes to overlay backing file
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:46:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4dc6344-445c-44b8-b5ea-2eb8e2d051d1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjC=-GOFi3J4ctcNgdMfaerkae30OH9=TkKTWCf=TP95g@mail.gmail.com>



On 1/31/24 08:56, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:46 PM Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> To avoid caching effects to take effect reset the EVM status upon
>> detecting changes to the overlay backing files. This prevents a not-yet-
>> copied-up file on the overlay from executing if for example the
>> security.evm xattr on the file on the 'lower' layer has been removed.
>>
> 
> And what is expected to happen when file is executed after copy up?

The copy-up may be triggered by changing file content or file metadata.
For EVM file metadata (file attributes and xattrs) are important and if 
they change EVM would re-evaluate the file, meaning that it would 
determine the file mode bits, uid, gid and xattrs and calculate a hash 
over them and compare this hash against the signature in security.evm.

> Doesn't this change also protect the same threat after copy up?

 From what I remember from my testing is that file attribute or extended 
attribute changes on an already copied-up file were already handled 
correctly, meaning they caused the re-evaluation of the file as 
described above.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/evm.h               | 8 ++++++++
>>   security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 7 +++++++
>>   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 ++
>>   3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h
>> index d8c0343436b8..e7d6742eee9d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/evm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/evm.h
>> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ extern int evm_protected_xattr_if_enabled(const char *req_xattr_name);
>>   extern int evm_read_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry, u8 *buffer,
>>                                       int buffer_size, char type,
>>                                       bool canonical_fmt);
>> +extern void evm_reset_cache_status(struct dentry *dentry,
>> +                                  struct integrity_iint_cache *iint);
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
>>   extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname);
>>   #else
>> @@ -189,5 +191,11 @@ static inline int evm_read_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry, u8 *buffer,
>>          return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline void evm_reset_cache_status(struct dentry *dentry,
>> +                                         struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
>> +{
>> +       return;
>> +}
>> +
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_EVM */
>>   #endif /* LINUX_EVM_H */
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
>> index 22a5e26860ea..e96d127b48a2 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
>> @@ -721,6 +721,13 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode)
>>                  iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>>   }
>>
>> +void evm_reset_cache_status(struct dentry *dentry,
>> +                           struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
>> +{
>> +       if (d_real_inode(dentry) != d_backing_inode(dentry))
>> +               iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * evm_revalidate_status - report whether EVM status re-validation is necessary
>>    * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> index cc1217ac2c6f..84bdc6e58329 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/ima.h>
>>   #include <linux/fs.h>
>>   #include <linux/iversion.h>
>> +#include <linux/evm.h>
>>
>>   #include "ima.h"
>>
>> @@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
>>                      !inode_eq_iversion(backing_inode, iint->version)) {
>>                          iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK;
>>                          iint->measured_pcrs = 0;
>> +                       evm_reset_cache_status(file_dentry(file), iint);
>>                  }
>>          }
> 
> Make sense.
> Unrelated to your change, I now noticed something odd about Mimi's change:
> 
>          backing_inode = d_real_inode(file_dentry(file));
> 
> I find the choice of variable name to be quite confusing, because ima/evm code
> uses  d_backing_inode() all over the place and d_real_inode() !=
> d_backing_inode().
> 
> First of all, there is never any reason to use d_backing_inode() and its name is
> quite confusing in the first place, but it will be a big cleanup to
> remove them all.
> 
> Suggest to rename the variable to real_inode, same as in
> ima_collect_measurement()
> to be consistent and reduce confusion factor, which is already high enough ;)
> 
> Thanks,
> Amir.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 21:46 [PATCH 0/5] evm: Support signatures on stacked filesystem Stefan Berger
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] security: allow finer granularity in permitting copy-up of security xattrs Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:25   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:25     ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-31 14:56       ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 13:35         ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-01 14:18           ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 11:58             ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-01 15:41     ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 16:47   ` kernel test robot
2024-01-31 19:06   ` kernel test robot
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] evm: Implement per signature type decision in security_inode_copy_up_xattr Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:28   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] ima: Reset EVM status upon detecting changes to overlay backing file Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:56   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:46     ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] evm: Use the real inode's metadata to calculate metadata hash Stefan Berger
2024-01-31  2:10   ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 13:16     ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:40       ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 15:54         ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 17:23           ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 17:46             ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 12:10               ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 13:36                 ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-01 14:11                   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 20:35                     ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02  9:24                       ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 14:59                         ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02 15:51                           ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 16:06                             ` Stefan Berger
2024-02-02 16:17                               ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-02 16:30                                 ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 17:25           ` Stefan Berger
2024-01-30 21:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] evm: Enforce signatures on unsupported filesystem for EVM_INIT_X509 Stefan Berger
2024-01-31 14:06   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-02-01 17:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2024-01-31 13:18 ` [PATCH 0/5] evm: Support signatures on stacked filesystem Amir Goldstein
2024-01-31 14:52   ` Stefan Berger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4dc6344-445c-44b8-b5ea-2eb8e2d051d1@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).