* [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes
@ 2024-01-10 15:59 Marco Pagani
2024-01-12 4:06 ` David Gow
2024-01-26 14:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Pagani @ 2024-01-10 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Brendan Higgins, David Gow, Jinjie Ruan, Rae Moar, Shuah Khan
Cc: Marco Pagani, Richard Fitzgerald, Javier Martinez Canillas,
linux-kselftest, kunit-dev, linux-kernel
Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed a wild-memory-access bug that could have
happened during the loading phase of test suites built and executed as
loadable modules. However, it also introduced a problematic side effect
that causes test suites modules to crash when they attempt to register
fake devices.
When a module is loaded, it traverses the MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED and
MODULE_STATE_COMING states before reaching the normal operating state
MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Finally, when the module is removed, it moves to
MODULE_STATE_GOING before being released. However, if the loading
function load_module() fails between complete_formation() and
do_init_module(), the module goes directly from MODULE_STATE_COMING to
MODULE_STATE_GOING without passing through MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
This behavior was causing kunit_module_exit() to be called without
having first executed kunit_module_init(). Since kunit_module_exit() is
responsible for freeing the memory allocated by kunit_module_init()
through kunit_filter_suites(), this behavior was resulting in a
wild-memory-access bug.
Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed this issue by running the tests when the
module is still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. However, modules in that state
are not fully initialized, lacking sysfs kobjects. Therefore, if a test
module attempts to register a fake device, it will inevitably crash.
This patch proposes a different approach to fix the original
wild-memory-access bug while restoring the normal module execution flow
by making kunit_module_exit() able to detect if kunit_module_init() has
previously initialized the tests suite set. In this way, test modules
can once again register fake devices without crashing.
This behavior is achieved by checking whether mod->kunit_suites is a
virtual or direct mapping address. If it is a virtual address, then
kunit_module_init() has allocated the suite_set in kunit_filter_suites()
using kmalloc_array(). On the contrary, if mod->kunit_suites is still
pointing to the original address that was set when looking up the
.kunit_test_suites section of the module, then the loading phase has
failed and there's no memory to be freed.
v4:
- rebased on 6.8
- noted that kunit_filter_suites() must return a virtual address
v3:
- add a comment to clarify why the start address is checked
v2:
- add include <linux/mm.h>
Fixes: 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Tested-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
---
lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 ++++
lib/kunit/test.c | 14 +++++++++++---
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 717b9599036b..689fff2b2b10 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ void kunit_free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set suite_set)
kfree(suite_set.start);
}
+/*
+ * Filter and reallocate test suites. Must return the filtered test suites set
+ * allocated at a valid virtual address or NULL in case of error.
+ */
struct kunit_suite_set
kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set,
const char *filter_glob,
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index f95d2093a0aa..31a5a992e646 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/panic.h>
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include "debugfs.h"
#include "device-impl.h"
@@ -801,12 +802,19 @@ static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod)
};
const char *action = kunit_action();
+ /*
+ * Check if the start address is a valid virtual address to detect
+ * if the module load sequence has failed and the suite set has not
+ * been initialized and filtered.
+ */
+ if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))
+ return;
+
if (!action)
__kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites,
mod->num_kunit_suites);
- if (suite_set.start)
- kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
+ kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
}
static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
@@ -816,12 +824,12 @@ static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
switch (val) {
case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
+ kunit_module_init(mod);
break;
case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
kunit_module_exit(mod);
break;
case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
- kunit_module_init(mod);
break;
case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
break;
base-commit: 539e582a375dedee95a4fa9ca3f37cdb25c441ec
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes
2024-01-10 15:59 [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes Marco Pagani
@ 2024-01-12 4:06 ` David Gow
2024-01-26 14:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2024-01-12 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Marco Pagani
Cc: Brendan Higgins, Jinjie Ruan, Rae Moar, Shuah Khan,
Richard Fitzgerald, Javier Martinez Canillas, linux-kselftest,
kunit-dev, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3039 bytes --]
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 23:59, Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
> kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed a wild-memory-access bug that could have
> happened during the loading phase of test suites built and executed as
> loadable modules. However, it also introduced a problematic side effect
> that causes test suites modules to crash when they attempt to register
> fake devices.
>
> When a module is loaded, it traverses the MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED and
> MODULE_STATE_COMING states before reaching the normal operating state
> MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Finally, when the module is removed, it moves to
> MODULE_STATE_GOING before being released. However, if the loading
> function load_module() fails between complete_formation() and
> do_init_module(), the module goes directly from MODULE_STATE_COMING to
> MODULE_STATE_GOING without passing through MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
>
> This behavior was causing kunit_module_exit() to be called without
> having first executed kunit_module_init(). Since kunit_module_exit() is
> responsible for freeing the memory allocated by kunit_module_init()
> through kunit_filter_suites(), this behavior was resulting in a
> wild-memory-access bug.
>
> Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
> kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed this issue by running the tests when the
> module is still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. However, modules in that state
> are not fully initialized, lacking sysfs kobjects. Therefore, if a test
> module attempts to register a fake device, it will inevitably crash.
>
> This patch proposes a different approach to fix the original
> wild-memory-access bug while restoring the normal module execution flow
> by making kunit_module_exit() able to detect if kunit_module_init() has
> previously initialized the tests suite set. In this way, test modules
> can once again register fake devices without crashing.
>
> This behavior is achieved by checking whether mod->kunit_suites is a
> virtual or direct mapping address. If it is a virtual address, then
> kunit_module_init() has allocated the suite_set in kunit_filter_suites()
> using kmalloc_array(). On the contrary, if mod->kunit_suites is still
> pointing to the original address that was set when looking up the
> .kunit_test_suites section of the module, then the loading phase has
> failed and there's no memory to be freed.
>
> v4:
> - rebased on 6.8
> - noted that kunit_filter_suites() must return a virtual address
> v3:
> - add a comment to clarify why the start address is checked
> v2:
> - add include <linux/mm.h>
>
> Fixes: 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Tested-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
> ---
Thanks very much.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cheers,
-- David
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4014 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes
2024-01-10 15:59 [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes Marco Pagani
2024-01-12 4:06 ` David Gow
@ 2024-01-26 14:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-01-26 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Marco Pagani
Cc: Brendan Higgins, David Gow, Jinjie Ruan, Rae Moar, Shuah Khan,
Richard Fitzgerald, Javier Martinez Canillas, linux-kselftest,
kunit-dev, linux-kernel
Hi Marco,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 5:01 PM Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com> wrote:
> Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
> kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed a wild-memory-access bug that could have
> happened during the loading phase of test suites built and executed as
> loadable modules. However, it also introduced a problematic side effect
> that causes test suites modules to crash when they attempt to register
> fake devices.
>
> When a module is loaded, it traverses the MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED and
> MODULE_STATE_COMING states before reaching the normal operating state
> MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Finally, when the module is removed, it moves to
> MODULE_STATE_GOING before being released. However, if the loading
> function load_module() fails between complete_formation() and
> do_init_module(), the module goes directly from MODULE_STATE_COMING to
> MODULE_STATE_GOING without passing through MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
>
> This behavior was causing kunit_module_exit() to be called without
> having first executed kunit_module_init(). Since kunit_module_exit() is
> responsible for freeing the memory allocated by kunit_module_init()
> through kunit_filter_suites(), this behavior was resulting in a
> wild-memory-access bug.
>
> Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
> kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed this issue by running the tests when the
> module is still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. However, modules in that state
> are not fully initialized, lacking sysfs kobjects. Therefore, if a test
> module attempts to register a fake device, it will inevitably crash.
>
> This patch proposes a different approach to fix the original
> wild-memory-access bug while restoring the normal module execution flow
> by making kunit_module_exit() able to detect if kunit_module_init() has
> previously initialized the tests suite set. In this way, test modules
> can once again register fake devices without crashing.
>
> This behavior is achieved by checking whether mod->kunit_suites is a
> virtual or direct mapping address. If it is a virtual address, then
> kunit_module_init() has allocated the suite_set in kunit_filter_suites()
> using kmalloc_array(). On the contrary, if mod->kunit_suites is still
> pointing to the original address that was set when looking up the
> kunit_test_suites section of the module, then the loading phase has
> failed and there's no memory to be freed.
>
> v4:
> - rebased on 6.8
> - noted that kunit_filter_suites() must return a virtual address
> v3:
> - add a comment to clarify why the start address is checked
> v2:
> - add include <linux/mm.h>
>
> Fixes: 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Tested-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
Thank you, this fixes the crashes I was seeing when running
platform_device_test, and which I bisected to the commit in the
Fixes tag.
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-26 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-10 15:59 [PATCH v4] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes Marco Pagani
2024-01-12 4:06 ` David Gow
2024-01-26 14:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).