From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
To: "teigland@redhat.com" <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>,
"zkabelac@redhat.com" <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
Glass Su <glass.su@suse.com>, "hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"bmarzins@redhat.com" <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
"linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev" <linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 20:35:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b7fd83b3f785b18cf77bf01519812db57f6e955.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZVz2LgBbiWrzLSgZ@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 12:25 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:10:12PM +0000, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > But I wonder if this is required. You could create a script that
> > calls pvscan, and then systemd-run / vgchange with the output of
> > the
> > pvscan command, and execute this script in RUN. That was roughly my
> > idea. That way you wouldn't loose any DEVLINKS added after 69-dm-
> > lvm.rules.
>
> I don't see any immediate problem with that idea, although using a
> script
> doesn't sound nice if it can be avoided. It seems academic since I'm
> not
> seeing a problem with the current method.
It's sort of academic, agreed. It would be easy to construct a case
where the DEVLINKS approach would fail, but that's unlikely to occur in
practice.
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-11 12:51 discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83 Heming Zhao
2023-11-13 11:52 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-13 13:52 ` Peter Rajnoha
2023-11-13 18:38 ` David Teigland
2023-11-14 7:55 ` Peter Rajnoha
2023-11-14 16:30 ` David Teigland
2023-11-15 8:51 ` Peter Rajnoha
2023-11-15 11:36 ` Heming Zhao
2023-11-15 19:12 ` David Teigland
2023-11-16 13:37 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2023-11-16 13:46 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-16 14:03 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2023-11-16 15:29 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-16 17:13 ` David Teigland
2023-11-16 15:10 ` David Teigland
2023-11-16 15:40 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-16 15:48 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2023-11-16 17:27 ` David Teigland
2023-11-16 15:59 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2023-11-17 1:47 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2023-11-17 15:25 ` David Teigland
2023-11-17 19:57 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2023-11-17 20:16 ` David Teigland
2023-11-17 21:03 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2023-11-17 21:05 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-20 10:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2023-11-15 21:02 ` David Teigland
2023-11-15 21:46 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-16 16:11 ` David Teigland
2023-11-14 10:44 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-14 12:18 ` Heming Zhao
2023-11-14 17:16 ` David Teigland
2023-11-14 17:00 ` David Teigland
2023-11-14 17:48 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-14 17:58 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-14 21:02 ` David Teigland
2023-11-15 7:35 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-16 16:34 ` David Teigland
2023-11-16 20:22 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2023-11-14 20:51 ` David Teigland
2023-11-15 5:15 ` Heming Zhao
2023-11-15 7:39 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-21 14:39 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-21 17:56 ` David Teigland
2023-11-21 18:10 ` Martin Wilck
2023-11-21 18:25 ` David Teigland
2023-11-21 20:35 ` Martin Wilck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b7fd83b3f785b18cf77bf01519812db57f6e955.camel@suse.com \
--to=martin.wilck@suse.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=glass.su@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).