Linux-MIPS Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	 Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/vdso: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:24:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260410091131-46b6354c-9d06-4e47-9345-ee224d8528f7@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b1ac7b9-fcc8-4aa3-a0ad-eb37e4bce030@app.fastmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 09:50:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2026, at 19:11, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 2026-02-27 01:34, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >>>>
> >>> The thing about gettimeofday() and time() is that they don't have
> >>> a 64-bit version and libc implementations are expected to call
> >>> clock_gettime() instead. The result was that there was never a
> >>> patch to turn the off either.
> >> 
> >> gettimeofday() is currently the only way to get the timezone of the kernel.
> >> But I guess this is a legacy thing anyways. If you say we should drop it,
> >> let's drop it.
> >> 
> >
> > The time zone in the kernel has never worked anyway, as it would require the
> > kernel to contain at least the forward portion of the zoneinfo/tzdata table in
> > order to actually work correctly. The only plausible use of it would be for
> > local time-based filesystems like FAT, but I don't think we bother.
> >
> > A bigger question is whether or not we should omit these from the vDSO
> > completely (potentially causing link failures) or replace them with stubs
> > returning -ENOSYS.
> 
> I see no harm in keeping gettimeofday() in the vdso when
> COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is turned on, as existing code will call it
> no matter whether it's in the vdso or the syscall.

We would still always keep them for 64-bit ABIs, right?

> Equally, I see no point in having either version of
> gettimeofday() or settimeofday() when COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is
> disabled, as clearly anything calling it would pass incorrect
> data for times past 2038.

Should we also drop the syscalls in these cases?
We will need to keep settimeofday() in some form to support the
timewarping call done by init.

Recap/Proposal:

* Keep the gettimeofday()/time() syscalls when they are y2038 safe or
  CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is set.
* Always provide settimeofday(). If CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME is *not*
  set, reject passing any 'tv' argument where it may not be y2038 safe.
* The vDSO functions always mirror the systemcall availability.


Thomas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-10  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-27  6:57 [PATCH 0/7] vDSO: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  8:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27  8:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27  9:34       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-03 18:11         ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-03 20:50           ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-03 21:00             ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-03 21:27               ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-03-03 21:36                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-04-10  7:24             ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2026-04-13 15:59               ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-04-13 16:13                 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-04-13 16:57                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-04-14 10:16                     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-04  7:35           ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-04 18:30             ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05  9:24               ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-05 23:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-06  9:42                   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-06 20:52                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: VDSO: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: vdso32: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc/vdso: " Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] MIPS: VDSO: Drop kconfig MIPS_CLOCK_VSYSCALL Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  8:46   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27  9:31     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27 10:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-02-27 10:17         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] MIPS: VDSO: Respect COMPAT_32BIT_TIME Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  6:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] vdso/gettimeofday: Verify COMPAT_32BIT_TIME interactions Thomas Weißschuh
2026-02-27  8:49   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260410091131-46b6354c-9d06-4e47-9345-ee224d8528f7@linutronix.de \
    --to=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).