From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@google.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>,
Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com>,
Jan Palus <jpalus@fastmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/exec: Build both static and non-static load_address tests
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 23:16:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405082312.D922795@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f6a2905-395d-4f81-9ee0-57c541fb2486@nvidia.com>
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:54:13PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> Didn't we learn recently, though, that -static-pie is gcc 8.1+, while the
> kernel's minimum gcc version is 5?
Yes, that's true. If we encounter anyone trying to build the selftests
with <8.1 I think we'll have to add a compiler version test in the
Makefile to exclude the static pie tests.
There's also the potential issue with arm64 builds that caused the
original attempt at -static. We'll likely need an exclusion there too.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-08 17:31 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_elf: Honor PT_LOAD alignment for static PIE Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/exec: Build both static and non-static load_address tests Kees Cook
2024-05-09 2:54 ` John Hubbard
2024-05-09 6:16 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-05-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_elf: Calculate total_size earlier Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] binfmt_elf: Honor PT_LOAD alignment for static PIE Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405082312.D922795@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ckennelly@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jpalus@fastmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rsalvaterra@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vstinner@redhat.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).