Linux-mm Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fault: speed up uffd-unit-test by 10x: rate-limit "MCE: Killing" logs
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 15:49:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adfd804c-a3a4-4a07-babb-0a957dafac4b@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHvVcg2FQCGBwm0Y41YGgpMYKs8_KJaonwyDg7SPuQipxqH2A@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/7/24 11:15 AM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:11 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/7/24 11:08 AM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 9:43 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>>>> That thread seems to have stalled.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there was no follow-up.
>>>
>>> Apologies, I had completely forgotten about this. I blame the weekend. :)
>>>
>>> No objections from me to the simple rate limiting proposed here, if
>>> useful you can take:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
>>>
>>> But, it seems to me the earlier proposal may still be useful.
>>> Specifically, don't print at all for "synthetic" poisons from
>>> UFFDIO_POISON or similar mechanisms. This way, "real" errors aren't
>>> gobbled up by the ratelimit due to spam from "synthetic" errors. If
>>> folks agree, I can *actually* send a patch this time. :)
>>>
>>
>> That sounds good to me. (Should it also rate limit, though? I'm leaning
>> toward yes.)
> 
> I believe the proposal so far was, simulated poisons aren't really
> "global" events, and are only relevant to the process itself. So don't
> send them to the global kernel log at all, and instead let the process
> do whatever it wants with them (e.g. it could print something when it
> receives a signal, perhaps with rate limiting).
  
OK. And seeing as how I'm not (at all) in alignment with Borislav on
where to apply rate limiting, we'd better go with your approach.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA



  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07  2:29 [PATCH] x86/fault: speed up uffd-unit-test by 10x: rate-limit "MCE: Killing" logs John Hubbard
2024-05-07  8:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:28   ` John Hubbard
2024-05-07 16:43     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:53       ` John Hubbard
2024-05-07 16:55         ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 18:08       ` Axel Rasmussen
2024-05-07 18:10         ` John Hubbard
2024-05-07 18:15           ` Axel Rasmussen
2024-05-07 22:49             ` John Hubbard [this message]
2024-05-07 19:26 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adfd804c-a3a4-4a07-babb-0a957dafac4b@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).