From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
This is a series of patches to the numactl/libnuma package, against
numactl-2.0.3-rc2. A couple of these patches include hunks that may
be or are already in the Cliff's tree--see the patch descriptions.
I've included them here as these are what I've tested with.
+ libnuma:
++ fix apparent bitmask memory leaks;
++ always return freeable bitmask pointers, instead of pointers to
libnuma exported masks such as numa_no_nodes_ptr
++ fix parsing of /proc/self/status cpu and node masks in
set_thread_constraints.
+ numademo:
++ add extra loop in memtest() to eliminate page allocation overhead
from bandwidth stats.
+ Makefile:
++ define LIBNUMA_SO and use throughout the Makefile to support
multiple versions on a system.
+ test/checkaffinity:
++ fix test expression to work if numactl should fail.
Pick and choose as you see fit, Cliff.
Lee
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).