Linux-OMAP Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: possible deprecation and removal of some old QEMU Arm machine types (pxa2xx, omap, sa1110)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:36:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bd858a2-9983-4ddf-8749-09c9b2e261f9@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-bqOM4Ptws-tsEwo2HDZ6YSX1Y+xGkR0WueRD_dUd0+Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 03:14:21PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 14:36, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > On 2/12/24 04:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > The machines I have in mind are:
> > >
> > > PXA2xx machines:
> > >
> > > akita                Sharp SL-C1000 (Akita) PDA (PXA270)
> > > borzoi               Sharp SL-C3100 (Borzoi) PDA (PXA270)
> > > connex               Gumstix Connex (PXA255)
> > > mainstone            Mainstone II (PXA27x)
> > > spitz                Sharp SL-C3000 (Spitz) PDA (PXA270)
> > > terrier              Sharp SL-C3200 (Terrier) PDA (PXA270)
> > > tosa                 Sharp SL-6000 (Tosa) PDA (PXA255)
> > > verdex               Gumstix Verdex Pro XL6P COMs (PXA270)
> > > z2                   Zipit Z2 (PXA27x)
> > >
> > I test akita, borzoi, spitz, and terrier. Upstream Linux removed support
> > for mainstone, tosa, and z2 from the Linux kernel as of version 6.0, so
> > I am no longer testing those.
> >
> > I never managed to boot connex or verdex.
> >
> > > OMAP1 machines:
> > >
> > > cheetah              Palm Tungsten|E aka. Cheetah PDA (OMAP310)
> > > sx1                  Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V2
> > > sx1-v1               Siemens SX1 (OMAP310) V1
> > >
> > I test sx1. I don't think I ever tried cheetah, and I could not get sx1-v1
> > to work.
> >
> > > OMAP2 machines:
> > >
> > > n800                 Nokia N800 tablet aka. RX-34 (OMAP2420)
> > > n810                 Nokia N810 tablet aka. RX-44 (OMAP2420)
> > >
> > I never managed to get those to boot the Linux kernel.
> >
> > > The one SA1110 machine:
> > >
> > > collie               Sharp SL-5500 (Collie) PDA (SA-1110)
> > >
> > I do test collie.
> >
> > All the ones I use still boot the latest Linux kernel.
> >
> > > Obviously if we can remove all the machines that used a given
> > > SoC, that's much more effective than if we just delete one or two.
> > >
> > > I don't have any test images for the SA1110 or OMAP1 machines,
> > > so those are the ones I am most keen to be able to drop.
> > > I do have test images for a few of the pxa2xx and the OMAP2 machines.
> > >
> > I don't mind dropping them, just listing what I use for testing the
> > Linux kernel. I suspect I may be the only "user" of those boards,
> > though, both in Linux and qemu.
> 
> Mmm; there's not much point in both QEMU and the kernel
> maintaining code that nobody's using. Are you considering
> dropping support for any of these SoC families from the kernel?
> 
Not me personally. Arnd is the one mostly involved in dropping
support of obsolete hardware from the kernel.

> It sounds like between the two of us we do have at least one
> test image per SoC type if we do keep any of these, but
> if it isn't going to inconvenience kernel testing I'm
> inclined to go ahead with deprecate-and-drop for the whole lot.
> (With QEMU's deprecate-and-drop policy, that would be "announce
> deprecation now for 9.0, keep in 9.1, remove before 9.2 release
> at the end of the year".) At a minimum I would like to drop
> the OMAP1 and OMAP2 boards, as that's the biggest code burden.
> 

I am copying Arnd, the OMAP1 Linux kernel maintainers, PXA2 maintainers,
and the Linux omap mailing list for input. Sorry for the noise for those
who don't care, but I think it is useful to have your voices heard.

Personally I think it very unlikely that anyone is using the latest Linux
kernel on any of the affected machines, but I may be wrong.

Thanks,
Guenter

       reply	other threads:[~2024-02-13 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFEAcA88UGhjh8-iBvhxx6GdWg74dinYouiguTcz=qEe51L7Ag@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <fe5476c7-82e0-4353-a943-7f39b14e1b5b@roeck-us.net>
     [not found]   ` <CAFEAcA-bqOM4Ptws-tsEwo2HDZ6YSX1Y+xGkR0WueRD_dUd0+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2024-02-13 15:36     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-02-13 20:11       ` possible deprecation and removal of some old QEMU Arm machine types (pxa2xx, omap, sa1110) Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-13 21:21         ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-14 10:14           ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-14 12:26           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-14 13:39             ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-02-14 22:15               ` Andrea Adami
2024-02-14 22:42             ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-15  8:31               ` Andreas Kemnade
2024-02-15  8:45                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-15  8:52                   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-02-15 10:06                     ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-02-15 11:31                 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2024-02-14  1:27         ` Aaro Koskinen
2024-02-14  5:53           ` Tony Lindgren
2024-02-14 14:57           ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-14  9:08         ` Daniel Mack
2024-03-08 15:41       ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-08 15:50         ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bd858a2-9983-4ddf-8749-09c9b2e261f9@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmkrzyszt@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).